Poor Queenie...


© Imtiaz Maqbool

Last week I mentioned how the parts of Pakistan Queen Elizabeth II was supposed to visit were being cleaned "spic and span," as well as the pains the administration was taking to make sure that her visit would be pleasant and enjoyable. But the Queen's visit to the Subcontinent did not turn out to be entirely pleasant. The "Jallianwala" controversy as well as the unfavourable reaction to Her Majesty's mediation offer on Kashmir marred her visit. I intend to cover Jallianwala this week, so watch out for the Kashmir fiasco next week!

Jallianwala Bagh

The history of the "Jallianwala Massacre" is not a pleasant one. The link just mentioned gives an immensely detailed and heartrending account of the incident that is worth reading. On Apr. 13, 1919, British General Dyer ordered his platoon of infantry to fire into the citizens assembled at Jallianwala Bagh as part of the Baisakhi celebrations. People from across the subcontinent have been demanding that the Queen make a public apology.

Official accounts put the toll at 379 killed and around 2,000 wounded. Dyer, for his part, received a purse of 20,000 pounds (raised unofficially by the British public). In fact, through the rest of his life, Dyer maintained that the carnage had been a "jolly good thing" — a sort of "put them in their place, didn't I?" attitude that, officially, Britain did nothing to censure. Reportedly, General Dyer was hardly remorseful for the massacre. But it has been said that this "jolly good thing" proved to be the beginning of the end of British rule on the Indian Subcontinent.

It was the Indian PM himself who started the whole thing with his statement that the Queen should avoid visiting Amritsar. The stormed kicked up as a result of this statement was for all to see. Newspapers started demanding that the Queen apologize across the board.

"Why just Jallianwala? If the Queen apologises, it should be for all crimes perpetrated under the Union Jack."

Others started to criticize both Pakistani and Indian governments for making elaborate arrangements for the Queen's visit.

Papers in Pakistan blasted the Speaker of the National Assembly for declaring that he was still a "loyal subject" of Her Majesty. An article in The News said,

"Still, the Queen's visit was worth the expense — it bought an insight into the small and slavish minds that rule Pakistan. It also proved that the British may have gone, but freedom remains a dream."

Go To Page: 1 2


The copyright of the article Poor Queenie... in South Asian Politics is owned by . Permission to republish Poor Queenie... in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

3.   Oct 21, 1997 8:27 PM
And you get back to answer your discussions.....

Keep it up. ;-)

What makes me mad, is that the British electorate chose to vote in a party that would take Britain down, as far as Interna ...


-- posted by Traveller


2.   Oct 21, 1997 5:17 PM
You actually DO read my article! That's 1....just 49,999 to go :)

Ofcourse the Queen wasn't wrong when she asked for peace in the subcontinent. But I'm sorry to say that peace in the subcontinent ...


-- posted by immaqbool


1.   Oct 21, 1997 1:18 AM
Did The Queen speak out wrongly in Islamabad when she called for reconciliation between Pakistan and India?

<img src="/userfiles/3313/QE2.jpg">
Copyright


-- posted by Traveller





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Imtiaz Maqbool's South Asian Politics topic, please visit the Discussions page.