Body vs. Talent


© Sarah Lee

Billy Kay, Robyn Richards, Laura Bell Bundy, and Craig Lawlor, this is just a small list of the young actors who have been fired, replaced, recast, and/or moved to recurring, because of physical "imperfections". Some have gotten their job back because fans yelled hard enough, some were recast so fast there was not even a chance for an appeal. Either way these casting choices send this huge statement that they were wrong to cast based on talent, actor rapport, chemistry, and resonance. No, no, they erase that statement and replace it with the prettiest "actor". Ironically, more often than not, the fired youngsters were incredibly talented and dynamic performers. It wasn't like these performers were unpopular with the audience and so executives could naturally leap to the idea that the problem was these kids weren't good looking enough. They were all incredibly popular with viewers and critics across the board. But they all got the axe in the end because they were too "normal" looking. Executives may deny it, but when they recast with some former model with no real acting training months, weeks, sometimes days later, those denials ring as false as they should. There are so many problems with this. For starters, what in the heck is wrong with looking normal?!

I won't deny that looks in television, especially in soaps are a huge focus. Let's face it, most soap producers and executives don't care about the actors. There is a bottom line, a business, an assembly line of television to produce and they feel they don't have time to hold people's hands so they're brutal instead. Women with small breasts all of the sudden get bigger ones, women who are a healthy size eight all of the sudden shrink down to a size two. Men who don't have six pack abs and gorgeous chests never have love scenes, men who don't have hair, have graying hair, or are shorter than their leading lady better have seniority on their side or lifts and Rogaine. Meanwhile teenagers who don't look good in the newest fashions are recast. Frankly, I've always been confused by the breast augmentation in the soap industry. The same producers and executives who say that soaps are for bored housewives think an actress having fake breasts will draw them in? I mean they don't seem to believe men watch, so putting fake women in tight bikinis I would think serve them no purpose. Nevertheless, the actors who are front and center and under thirty-five are constantly pressured to look well, "better than normal". It doesn't matter if their character is too poor to afford the latest clothes, they'll still be wearing them. It doesn't matter if a good girl is supposed to be mousy and sweet, she will still be dressed like a tart with her breasts plunging out of her clothes. What does seem to matter is this ridiculous standard of what beautiful is and how normal automatically doesn't fit the bill.

Go To Page: 1 2 3 4


The copyright of the article Body vs. Talent in Soap Opera Reviews is owned by . Permission to republish Body vs. Talent in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo