|
|
|||
|
|
In the 1950s, women looked upon women who wanted equality, who wanted birth control, who wanted independence, with disdain. Fifty years later this still exists to some extent. As late as the 1980s, the most popular romantic stories either on film or television was about the big hunk hero who saved the woman. Oh sure, some of the women appeared strong, had their own business, their own careers, may have even gone against the tide by having abortions or taking birth control, but something always wore them down and men needed to help them, rescue them. Meanwhile the women who really took the bull by the horns were the villains, the girls that were mentally unstable, abusive, never to be sympathized with. That to me says the creative teams behind these characters either believe the audience doesn't like to see independent heroines or they don't believe they can make them likable. Does it bother me? Well, yes and no. It bothers me that when the men are brutes, cruel, cocky, arrogant, and criminal, ladies still swoon. But that happens in real life, many a woman who is independent craves dependence. I get that. What bothers me is just how stupid women are getting in soaps today, going far beyond the proverbial weak in the knees attitude divas in love have.
The copyright of the article Spineless Ladies in Soap Opera Reviews is owned by Sarah Lee. Permission to republish Spineless Ladies in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Sarah Lee's Soap Opera Reviews topic, please visit the Discussions page. |
||
|
|
|||