Within Bart Baggett's Handwriting Analysis site, he presents two related theories. Similarity basically goes like this: The more alike two people are (in attractiveness, values, education, economic status, etc.) the greater the chance they'll seek out each other and form a quality relationship. The Complementary theory, on the other hand, states that one person's area of weakness(s) is complemented by the other's strength(s) in the same areas and vice versa. Under this premise, each partner thus complements and completes the other.
Ironically, the latter form of attraction reminded me of an excerpt from the book I just finished reading. The Bridge Across Forever by Richard Bach. "How much there is to know from her, I thought. What has she learned...has it changed her, hurt her, made her build walls, too? There was about her a certain confident, positive grasp of life that was magnetic, deliciously attractive. She's stood on mountaintops I've only sighted from far off; she's seen lights, she knows secrets I've never found."
True attraction comes more from within than from outward appearances. Someone could be physically gorgeous to look at, (at "first sight") but if that same person has no character to back it up, he/she could later be perceived as downright unattractive. Likewise, an average/plain-looking person could very naturally become more and more attractive as he/she begins to unveil his/her inner self. If we find that average-looking person interesting, adoration can be sparked and grow alongside the attraction. This gradual attraction actually can lead to a more genuine, longer lasting connection.
If you're open for some fun and insight, try the following methods to determine the traits (physical, emotional and mental) which you consider attractive, then make your unique list.
Go To Page: 1 2
