Foundation series : Enlightened morality (II)


© Francois Tremblay
Articles in this Topic    Discussions in this Topic

We have previously examined the main virtues of rational morality, and how it must be based on reason. It is worth repeating again: rationality, not emotional acceptance, is the fundamental criteria for moral judgment. This is why religious attempts at moral codes fail miserably. They are based on faith, sacrifice, and ignorance, and as such they cannot be a good standard.

It has become trivial to demonstrate that monotheistic moral standards are ridiculously anti-man and anti-life. Christianity, for instance, reifies the sacrifice of Jesus - in their eyes, representing absolute virtue - in the name of the salvation of sin. Its moral rules are based on physical and intellectual submission to God and his authorities. It promotes genocide, murder, slavery, capital punishment for non-violent crimes, absolutism, idolatry, and so on and so forth.

McDonald: "Now a lot of people find great comfort from religion. Not everybody is as you are---well-favored, handsome, wealthy, with a good job, happy family life. I mean, your life is good---not everybody's life is good, and religion brings them comfort."
Dawkins: "There are all sorts of things that would be comforting. I expect an injection of morphine would be comforting---it might be more comforting, for all I know. But to say that something is comforting is not to say that it's true."

Sheena McDonald and Richard Dawkins interview, The Vision Thing, August 1994

It may be comforting to believe that there is a final arbiter of justice. However, that conception goes counter to what religion itself says, as it portrays God as a giver of eternal punishment. But most importantly, this is not a comfort to the victims of religious politics and violence in the world.

One's comfort is irrelevant to reality. If we commit ourselves to reason, then we commit ourselves to follow reality, not fairy tales. This prerequisite of rationality is our foundation to reject religious morality and accept rational virtues as our moral guide. I will complete the second half of this article by examining two complex aspects of spirituality and morality.



3. Individualism.

Individualism is based on the rational understanding that only I can think for myself, only I can act for myself, only I benefit or suffer for myself. This is intuitive at a basic level: we know very well that no one can eat for us, or breathe for us. It is true of everything else. I cannot get someone else to think for me, or act for me. At best, I can believe someone else who tells me what to think and how to act, which is irrational.

Go To Page: 1 2 3 4 5


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo