Showing vs. TellingShowing versus Telling Seems rather simple, but I think most authors still find themselves doing it on more occasions than they like (or even know). "It" being the tendency to EXPLAIN things to your reader rather than having him understand what's going on through dialogue, description, and action. Occasionally this is brought to an author's attention while participating in a critique group (we'll cover critique groups in another article) and more than one reader mentions this criticism. You, of course, are shocked; you had NO idea. The difference between "showing" and "telling" is narrative summary (no specific setting, characters, or dialogue). Readers need to "see" events unfolding, infer tones and attitudes, not have things DESCRIBED to them. A lot of beginning authors rely on narrative summary to tell their stories. This is far easier than writing a scene, but it doesn't make for good reading. Now, more so than ever before, it is imperative to learn the difference and rely heavily on showing rather than telling. Readers no longer put up with huge chunks of exposition as a standard for story-telling. If a book is thumbed through and large, unwieldy paragraphs are seen instead of short paragraphs and lots of dialogue, the book is likely to go back on the shelf. This is not me telling anyone how to write, or how to pander to the masses; I'm just being practical and realistic. Seeing examples is a great way to re-focus the idea of showing versus telling.
|