THE PRESIDENTIAL LINE OF SUCCESSION: WHO'S NEXT? - Page 2


© John S. Cooper
Page 2
Later during his term, Tyler narrowly avoided being killed. He was hosting a party on the Presidential yacht, Princeton. The main event of the evening was to be a test firing of a new naval cannon called the Peacemaker. At the appointed time, the president, members of the cabinet, and various admirals and generals went up on deck and watched the firing. Tyler, of course, had the best position, surrounded by the others. The firing was a great success.

Later in the evening, it was suggested to have a second firing. As the guests went up on deck, Tyler was called back by his fiance, Julia Gardiner. They stayed below decks talking while the Peacemaker was fired again. The Peacemaker exploded, killing a number of people all of whom were standing around the spot where Tyler would have been standing. In addition to a number of military people, the Secretaries of State and Treasury were killed. Had Tyler been up on deck, he would have almost assuredly been killed, and as he had no Vice President (he was himself a Vice President who moved up on the death of President Harrison), we would have seen the legislated line of succession used to designate the next president.

The next problem involving the line of succession took place in 1868. President Andrew Johnson (elected Vice President who moved up to the Presidency on the assassination of Abraham Lincoln) was impeached. As he had no Vice President, the next in line was Senator Benjamin Wade, the President Pro Tempore of the Senate. The Senate acts as the jury in an impeachment trial, and Ben Wade swore to do impartial justice when he would become President if Johnson were convicted. Wade and most of the senators even announced how they would vote before the trial began. Obviously, this presented a serious conflict of interests. Johnson was acquitted by one vote, and finished his term.

In 1886, the second President Succession Act was passed. This removed the conflict of interests that became obvious in the Johnson impeachment by removing members of Congress from the line of succession. The order now went from the Vice President through the cabinet starting with State, Treasury, War, and on through in order of creation.

When Woodrow Wilson ran for re-election in 1916, even he thought he would lose. He wrote a letter to his Vice President asking his agreement to a plan which would have Wilson and his Vice President resign after appointing his victorious opponent as Secretary of State. According to the laws of succession, this would allow the President-elect to become President immediately. Wilson felt this necessary because of the looming threat of war. Wilson won in close and surprising victory, and the plan to make his successor Secretary of State was not necessary.

Go To Page: 1 2 3


The copyright of the article THE PRESIDENTIAL LINE OF SUCCESSION: WHO'S NEXT? - Page 2 in American Presidents is owned by . Permission to republish THE PRESIDENTIAL LINE OF SUCCESSION: WHO'S NEXT? - Page 2 in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

14.   Aug 7, 2003 6:56 PM
In response to message posted by howardhouk:


This is an interesting question that comes up now and then. It is a ...

-- posted by Mugwump53


13.   Aug 7, 2003 6:28 PM
Ok, here's an obscure question that has been a topic of discussion among my friends for awhile now.

Assume a second-term president is on his way out, and elections have been held (with a clear winn ...


-- posted by howardhouk


12.   Apr 3, 2003 4:12 PM
In response to message posted by BrianTubbs:


Inexplicable? Darn! I was hoping you could explain, because I do i ...

-- posted by Mugwump53


11.   Apr 3, 2003 4:05 PM
In response to message posted by Mugwump53:

I definitely meant Jackson. That was an inexplicable error of communic ...


-- posted by BrianTubbs


10.   Mar 27, 2003 5:36 PM
In response to message posted by BrianTubbs:


Hi, Brian.

I can only assume you meant to type Andrew Jackson ra ...


-- posted by Mugwump53





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to John S. Cooper's American Presidents topic, please visit the Discussions page.