Suite101

Trivializing the Cross


© Blake Atwood

Just yesterday, Palm Sunday of the year of our Lord 2002, I had the opportunity to be a part of a musical production as put on by the local Baptist church. All of the people involved with the production did their respective duties to the utmost of their abilities. In other words, it was an excellent representation of the death and resurrection of Jesus.

But I had a problem with it, a problem that others in my cohort seemed to perceive as well.

One scene in particular calls to mind what I call the trivialization of the Cross. This scene had Jesus (well...the guy that was playing Jesus) on the cross where all could see him, bathed in streaks of blood, crown of thorns around his brow, hands outstretched, "nailed" to the cross.

What makes this so bad?

It's an act. Not an act of worship, but an act. As in acting. As in not real.

In other articles I've been an advocate for the reinstatement of visual imagery to the church. Now it must appear that I'm contradicting myself. I don't think I am; I think I'm simply refining what I've said before.

We are most definitely a society that associates more meaning with images than words. Take the swoosh or the golden arches. Thus, efforts like the Jesus video and the musical production I speak of seem like grand ideas for they would appear to speak the most clearly to this video saturated generation.

But in some ways, this proliferation of images that pervades our minds trivializes the meaning of the Cross, the meaning of what was personally done for you and for me. It cheapens the grace that was bought on that hill so long ago.

It's the same argument, to me, as violence on television and the movies. We see so much of it that hardly anything about the violence in these mediums shocks us. We become desensitized.

Have we become desensitized to the Cross? Further, have we become desensitized to the One who died on that cross?

Is it too much of a reach to say that too many images or representations of the story of Christ can do the same? On the other hand, one could argue that sharing the story of Christ through any means possible (i.e. Paul becoming a Greek to the Greeks or a Jew to the Jews) is exactly what we're doing when we use so many different images, or musicals, or whatever.

Go To Page: 1 2


The copyright of the article Trivializing the Cross in Christianity & Culture is owned by . Permission to republish Trivializing the Cross in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

2.   Oct 28, 2002 2:04 PM
Everything trivializes the cross.

One of the problems your article seems to be dealing with is the incessant drive we have to make sure what we do is equal to the task. The mere fact that the peop ...


-- posted by Phil_J


1.   Mar 25, 2002 8:12 PM
It occurred to me that we really don't know what the cross is. It isn't that we are numb to the image, we just really don't have a clue to the cultural context in which the cross used or the nature of ...

-- posted by AlmosToast





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Blake Atwood's Christianity & Culture topic, please visit the Discussions page.