The Secret Plan


© Frank Monaldo
Articles in this Topic    Discussions in this Topic
Page 3

"But in order to do it, we would have had to take them in on attack helicopters 900 miles from the nearest boat - maybe illegally violating the airspace of people if they wouldn't give us approval. And we would have had to do a refueling stop." [2]

It is clear that no president, not George Bush nor Bill Clinton, anticipated an attack as large and as horribly successful as the one that happened. If Clinton could have remained in office, is doubtful that the president that backed down when the Iraqis refused to allow unfettered access to weapons inspectors, launched cruise missiles against tents in the Afghan desert, and that refused to take custody of bin Laden would have launched a potentially unpopular attack.

When the history of the Clinton Administration is written, there may be minor criticism for a lack pre-emptive actions against a murky threat. However, this Time story provides conspicuous evidence of the former Administration's vanity. This desperate effort to prop up the Clinton legacy provides yet another example of how spectacularly small and self-centered it was. For this we owe Time a debt of gratitude.

  1. For Clinton quotes, see http://www.gargaro.com/clintonquotes.html

  2. NewsMax.com.

Go To Page: 1 2 3


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

9.   Dec 6, 2002 11:10 AM
In response to message posted by spondulix:

As far as the vacation issue is concerned I tend to agree that its not much of ...

-- posted by spondulix11


8.   Dec 5, 2002 4:19 PM
In response to message posted by Frank_Monaldo:

dear Frank,

I guess you had better define "serious" so we can be on ...


-- posted by spondulix


7.   Dec 5, 2002 2:34 PM
In response to message posted by spondulix:

Dear Spondulix,

I do not think I was criticizing Clinton for not doing mor ...


-- posted by Frank_Monaldo


6.   Dec 5, 2002 10:49 AM
In response to message posted by Frank_Monaldo:

Frank were you as good at spinning the bottle as you are with spinning your ...

-- posted by spondulix


5.   Aug 24, 2002 4:58 AM
Dear Buzzcook and MattB_5,

The point of the original article was not to chastise the Clinton Administration for its actions with respect to protecting the US against terrorism. What was or wasn’t ...


-- posted by Frank_Monaldo





Join the latest discussions

For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Frank Monaldo's Conservative Politics topic, please visit the Discussions page.