The Temptation of Social Science


© Frank Monaldo

"Thou shalt not answer questionnaires
Or quizzes upon world affairs,
Nor with compliance take any test.
Thou shalt not sit with statisticians nor commit
A social science.''
- W. H. Auden, Note on Intellectuals.

"...the humanities shop has turned out to be selling diverse and ill-assorted antiques, decaying and even dustier [than the social sciences], while business gets worse and worse. Social science has proved more robust, more in harmony with a world dominated by natural science, and while losing its inspiration and evangelical fervor, has proved useful in different aspects of modern life, as the mere mention of economics and psychology indicates." - Allan Bloom, The Closing of the American Mind.

"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist the facts to suit the theories, instead of theories to suit facts." - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle?s Sherlock Holmes.

Youth is open to possibilities and carries a confidence and even hubris about subduing the world before it. As a youthful science in the nineteenth century, physics possessed its portion of presumptuous certitude. Success, particularly at computing the precise future position of the planets, persuaded some physicists that, given the position and velocity of every object, the future state of the universe could be perfectly predicted. It was not until the twentieth century, when ironically, physicists could explain the universe at a more fundamental level that they could precisely place limits on their ability to know. Physicists retain much of their arrogance, but have at least placed a rigid upper bound on it.

The social sciences began this century with much of the nineteenth century's confidence in the application of the scientific method to social problems. Indeed, the dominant ideology of the beginning of the century, socialism, asserted legitimacy and inevitability by claiming to be the "scientific" way to manage society. Unfortunately, social institutions and arrangements are inherently difficult to study. The results of social science studies can too easily depend upon the biases and preconceptions the social scientist brings. Ben Wattenberg of PBS's Think Tank recently discussed with Seymour Lipset and James Q. Wilson, both former presidents of the American Political Science Association, the temptations potentially trapping social scientists. Several examples serve to illustrate.

Anthropologist Margaret Mead wanted to believe that sexual taboos were the product of arbitrary social constructs in the West and sexual roles were culturally and not biologically based. Such observations would accord with the conventional wisdom of the elites at the time. Mead's findings in Coming of Age in Samoa confirmed these notions. However, Mead was not sufficiently fluent in the Samoan language and certainly far too credulous of fabulous stories told by young Samoan girls because she wanted to believe them. Consequently, Meade leaped to unfounded conclusions and at best drew a caricature of Samoan society.

Go To Page: 1 2


The copyright of the article The Temptation of Social Science in Conservative Politics is owned by . Permission to republish The Temptation of Social Science in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

160.   Jul 16, 1998 11:04 PM
My website features the self-definitions of socialist parties describing the internal structures of their proposed systems.

Yes, but as we have already seen, the self-definition you provide ...


-- posted by pseudoerasmus


159.   Jul 16, 1998 10:45 PM
Steve Kangas

There is no reason to suppose that just because the German Democratic Republic was no democracy, it was not socialist either. And, as we have seen, its kind of socialism wasn't unprec ...


-- posted by pseudoerasmus


158.   Jul 16, 1998 10:04 PM
Kelly:

Hmmm. Anarcho-socialists advocate the expansion of government? That's a new one on me.

And socialists want handouts irrespective of merit? One of the right's oldest criticisms of giving w ...


-- posted by SteveK


157.   Jul 16, 1998 6:18 AM
Steve: And definitionally, (not self-labeled) socialists of all stripes support the expansion of centralized big government, increased regulation of private property, and hand-outs irrespective of me ...

-- posted by KellyD_3


156.   Jul 15, 1998 10:59 PM
Alex:

I'm on the fly, so this will be brief...

You are confusing self-definitions for self-labels. The history of self-labels is replete with propagandistic lies, ranging from East Germany's cla ...


-- posted by SteveK





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Frank Monaldo's Conservative Politics topic, please visit the Discussions page.