Care of the Next Generation


© Frank Monaldo

For anyone who has the opportunity to teach little children or coach them in sports or even act as a chaperon on a field trip, it does take long to arrive at generalizations about the effect of different child rearing approaches. Of course there are many exceptions, but there is a clear, observable relationship between the structure of homes children come from, and their behavior.

Children with two parents, and particularly children from homes where at least one parent stays at home to raise the children, are more self-assured and calmer, and enjoy greater self-discipline. These children generally perform better in school.

As Maggie Gallagher reports in the National Review in an article titled "Day Careless," this common-sense notion is finally receiving serious consideration from the social sciences. Michael Lamb of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHDD) published a review of the day care literature. Although day care does not necessarily have to have a negative impact, children raised in day care performed less well academically and tend to have greater disciplinary problems in school. A Texas study by Deborah Lowe Vandell and Mary Anne Corasaniti found that a child's day-care history is an important predictor of maladjustment. Although there are small negative health effects caused by the spread of viral diseases in child-care settings, the real problems are cognitive and emotional. Maggie Gallagher reports that

"One longitudinal study of 33 private nurseries in Great Britain, for example, found that six-year-olds who had been placed in extensive day care as infants had retarded language skills when compared to home-reared children."
This was particularly notable in that the socioeconomic status of home-reared children was lower than the children committed to day-care.

The counter argument is that the problem in not day care by hired strangers, but the lack of "quality" day care. However, the key ingredient to quality day care is not material inputs but the one-on-one, long-term emotional commitment and concern of an adult with a child. A person this committed to the long-term development of a child is usually called a parent.

Generalizations are hardly ever fair. There are many well-adjusted children who are raised in stranger-provided day care, and dysfunctional children raised by a stay-at-home parent. Nonetheless, when considering the effect of public policy, differences in child-rearing strategies are crucial. The nation has an interest in the necessary nurture of the next generation.

The President's recently enunciated approach to the problem is exactly the wrong

Go To Page: 1 2


The copyright of the article Care of the Next Generation in Conservative Politics is owned by . Permission to republish Care of the Next Generation in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

27.   May 10, 1998 9:47 PM
Brian Carpenter Ok, here is something to consider:
1. The US is still spending money it should not to keep up our "security" agreements. Security from exactly what? If the old bogeyman is to be b ...

-- posted by not_him_again


26.   May 10, 1998 5:02 PM
Carpenter

Alex, I agree that slaveholding is wrong, and I do not share the founding father's choice of fashion... unfortunately, that does not refute this argument. The internationalist paradigm ...


-- posted by pseudoerasmus


25.   May 10, 1998 3:31 PM
Brian Carpenter Agreed! But that still does not address the issue; why were so many of the founding fathers protectionists; what does wanting a strong central government involve that precludes prot ...

-- posted by not_him_again


24.   May 10, 1998 11:52 AM
Brian,

Your assessment of the Founding Fathers is incomplete. Not all the founding fathers were protectionists. James Madison and the Federalists saw the importance of a strong central government i ...


-- posted by Lawhawk


23.   May 10, 1998 9:17 AM
But most people were hard-core protectionists in the 18th century. And a lot of them were slave-owning, periwigged britch-wearers. So what? ...

-- posted by pseudoerasmus





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Frank Monaldo's Conservative Politics topic, please visit the Discussions page.