A Hermeneutics of Baloney


© Frank Monaldo

" . . . [C]onservative professors tend to come from the math and computer science departments. In the social sciences, where human affairs are actually studied, liberalism predominates even more. What this suggests is really quite remarkable: that extensive study of humanity naturally leads one to liberal conclusions." — Steve Kangas.

"I'm worried about trends in the American Left — particularly here in academia — that at a minimum divert us from the task of formulating a progressive social critique, by leading smart and committed people into trendy but ultimately empty intellectual fashions . . . " — Alan Sokal.

Alan Sokal is a professor of physics at New York University. He lists his interests as computational physics, quantum field theory, statistical physics and mathematical physics. Add academic gadfly to this list.

Professor Sokal's left-wing credentials and human fallibility are evidenced by the fact he traveled to Nicaragua to teach mathematics for the Sandinista Regime. Sokal can not be dismissed as a right-wing complainer. What really rankles Sokal is the anti-intellectualism infecting campuses. He is critical of the deconstructist approach popular in humanities departments that argues there is no objective reality — that everything, even the sciences, are culturally dependent.

If you believe that physical laws are culturally dependent, walk out of a sixth story window in a different culture and see if gravity applies. Sokal affirms the Enlightment's rationalism and is disappointed and embarrassed by the embrace by some on the Left of alternate philosophies. While all sides of the political spectrum have their adherents who do not feel themselves constrained by rationalism, many of those on the Left have tenure.

In 1994 Sokal submitted a manuscript entitled "Transgressing the Boundaries — Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity" to the prestigious journal Social Text published by Duke University Press. The editors accepted the manuscript and the article was published in the Spring/Summer 1996 issue. Sokal revealed the hoax soon after in another journal Lingua Franca.

The article was a parody, full of deliberate nonsense. Sokal made silly and grandiose analogies with gravity, relativity, quantum mechanics arguing that these theories supported deconstructist criticism and cultural relativism. This is reminiscent of the Chinese President Jiang recently dismissing U.S. concerns about human rights violations by stating that:

"The theory of relativity worked out by Mr. Einstein, which is in the domain of natural science, I believe can also be applied to the political field. Both democracy and human rights are relative concepts and not

Go To Page: 1 2


The copyright of the article A Hermeneutics of Baloney in Conservative Politics is owned by . Permission to republish A Hermeneutics of Baloney in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

28.   May 13, 1998 8:26 AM
Three baseball umpires were having a dicussion. The first said, "I called them as I see them." The second one said, "I call them as they are." The last umpire proclaimed, "They aren't anything unti ...

-- posted by Frank_Monaldo


27.   May 13, 1998 8:15 AM
stop

-- posted by pseudoerasmus


26.   May 13, 1998 7:58 AM
Jason Gottlieb

We risk falling into the old debate about whether the tree in the woods makes a sound if nobody is there to hear it.

No, we're not.

And the problem of universals has NOT ...


-- posted by pseudoerasmus


25.   May 13, 1998 1:35 AM
Alex, I know what you mean, but I'm trying to be a bit more sophisticated than you may think I am. (My fault for not expressing that.)

An objective construct is an abstraction -- as ...

-- posted by Gottlieb


24.   May 11, 1998 7:15 AM
Jason

Oh, "horse" is also an objective construct. Not the particular spotted, grey mare on the field that you saw in the Korean countryside yesterday, but the abstraction called "horse" that's in ...


-- posted by pseudoerasmus





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Frank Monaldo's Conservative Politics topic, please visit the Discussions page.