|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
One convenient method for polemical distortion is to carefully select two points on a noisy or complex curve of some social indicator and draw misleading inferences. It is a technique that is not limited to any particular political orthodoxy. A few examples will illustrate.
Example 1The rate of drug use by teenagers had been declining steadily from 1979 to 1992. In the words of the 1995 Survey on Drug Abuse, "In 1992, the rate of past month use among youth aged 12-17 reached a low of 5.3 percent, the result of a decline from 16.3 percent in 1979. By 1994, the rate had climbed back to 8.2 percent, and in 1995 it increased again to 10.9 percent.' See the figure below.
Example 2FAIR (Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting) is a Left-leaning advocacy group masquerading as a dispassionate truth squad out to debunk errors in reporting. The notion that the "United States is number one" rankles FAIR to the marrow of its bones so it felt an uncontrollable need to debunk John Stossel's ABC television report of the same name. When Stossel reported increased incomes in the United States, FAIR argued that median rather than mean income was a better measure. FAIR then correctly claimed that inflation adjusted median income had reduced from 1989 to 1997. Why did they pick 1989 and 1997 as comparison points? In 1989, inflation-adjusted median income had reached its 1980's economic boom peak. A recession followed in the early 1990s. Since that low point, the economy has rebounded. Here are numbers for household median income pulled from the Census Bureau.
The copyright of the article Creative Statistics in Conservative Politics is owned by . Permission to republish Creative Statistics in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Frank Monaldo's Conservative Politics topic, please visit the Discussions page.
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||