Benefit of the Doubt
This exchange is terrifying. A high-ranking Congressional leader is seriously and soberly suggesting that a President of the United States would commit troops to thwart attempts to impeach him. We can be confident to a moral certainty that this President was willing to, at best, be evasive and misleading in a deliberate effort to deny a plaintiff in a federal civil rights case her day in court. We can be confident to a moral certainty, that in order to protect his legal liability this President will tell falsehoods to a federal grand jury. We can be confident to a moral certainty that even while under oath in his deposition to Congress, this President has chosen to prevaricate. This week Charles Krauthammer publicly questioned why, after 400 days of provocation, Clinton decided to commit American forces the day before the impeachment debate on the floor of the House. Krauthammer argues that the excuse of trying to launch the attack before Ramadan was flimsy. For Muslim nations the imperatives of war often outweigh religious sensibilities. The Yom Kippur War against Israel is called the Ramadan War by Arab states because it was launched at Ramadan. The strictures of Islam were not sufficient to prevent Iraq and Iran from battling viciously through many years of Ramadans.
The copyright of the article Benefit of the Doubt in Conservative Politics is owned by Frank Monaldo. Permission to republish Benefit of the Doubt in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
Articles in this Topic
Discussions in this Topic
|