Suite101

Thanks to the ACLU and PFAW


© Frank Monaldo

If you can endure the ponderous, heavy muggy summers, the small town of Ecru, Mississippi, seems like a Norman Rockwell sort of place to raise children. It is a small town where everyone knows everyone else, the sense of a nurturing community is palpable, and the local school is a center of community attention. At least that is the impression Lisa Herdahl had when she moved there from Wisconsin in 1994 with her six children.

Ecru was an isolated little island that the flood of Supreme Court decisions in the 1960s rushed by. The North Pontotoc Attendence Center (a K-12 school) broadcast Bible readings and prayer over the school's public address system to begin the school day and had done so for years. Herdahl was a Christian Scientist and objected to exposing her children to the Bible readings. She received little relief or sympathy from the school after her complaints. Putting headphones on Herdahl's children to block out the reading was a humiliating and unacceptable solution.

Despite their long tradition, the morning readings over the public address system had degraded to a parody of prayer. Children, as children are wont, were more likely to be fidgeting, talking, or staring at the ceiling than contemplating the meaning of the words buzzing through the public address system. Boredom, not rapture, was the most likely reaction.

In any case, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and People for the American Way (PFAW), ever on the alert lest young children in public schools be in an unconstitutionally spiritual frame of mind, rode their white horses to a litigious rescue. They sued the school district on Herdahl's behalf for relief. The school squandered $170,000 in legal fees, arguing that a student group called the Alethia Club initiated the readings and hence they did not violate First Amendment strictures. Ultimately, the courts found that the setting aside of school time for this reading on an ongoing basis, even if student-initiated, involved an excessive entanglement of the state with religion. Herdahl and her children were granted relief.

The result of the intervention by the ACLU and PFAW, however, has not proceeded as one might have expected. There are no longer prayers or Bible readings broadcast over the school's public address system. However, the children meet before school (1,200 of 1,300) for student-designed and student-managed prayer meetings. The meetings have continued for two years after the court's decision to stop the prayer broadcasts. Rather than consuming the thin soup of unthinking reading of the Bible, the act of organizing and running the prayer meetings has created a feast of meaning for the students. World Magazine [1] reports that Alethia Club members are themselves surprised by the student devotions. In the words of one student, "[The prayers] now mean something to us. We have to sacrifice to do it and people take it seriously."

Go To Page: 1 2


The copyright of the article Thanks to the ACLU and PFAW in Conservative Politics is owned by . Permission to republish Thanks to the ACLU and PFAW in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

59.   Sep 20, 2001 4:10 PM
It's easy for a blind squirrel to find a nut. Just look to the right.

-- posted by Blackstock


58.   Jan 14, 1999 11:38 PM
Bruce:

I am amazed at how conservatives cannot see the simplest of points when it threatens to overturn one of their pet arguments.

Of course the teacher opposed Zachary's reading of the Bible s ...


-- posted by SteveK


57.   Jan 14, 1999 1:05 PM
Steve writes:

Again, you have not demonstrated why the result is different when 1) A teacher reads the Bible to the class; or 2) A teacher allows someone else to r ...

-- posted by BruceV


56.   Jan 12, 1999 9:55 AM
Frank:

I think your fallacy can be highlighted even more simply than that. Our laws prohibit certain activities because of their results, not their motives, voluntariness or origin.

For e ...


-- posted by SteveK


55.   Jan 12, 1999 8:43 AM
Frank:

The fallacy in your entire argument is that Zachary's motive matter if a teacher allows him to become a vehicle of instruction for the rest of the class.

Yes, I know that Zachary voluntar ...


-- posted by SteveK





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Frank Monaldo's Conservative Politics topic, please visit the Discussions page.