Why Nations Develop


© Bryan Johnson

(Editors note: Proponents of foreign aid often argue that the program is necessary to achieve three broad goals: 1) to promote economic development in less developed countries, 2) to promote U.S. foreign policy initiatives abroad, and 3) to promote U.S. exports to recipient nations. The first three articles in this series have taken on each of these arguments. Each provides substantial reasoning and data to support the argument that the U.S. foreign aid program fails in all of these categories. Clearly, there are countries that do develop. The question is, what makes them develop and is foreign aid necessary to achieve development. This article is the capstone article in this four part series. The views presented here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Heritage Foundation or The Wall Street Journal .

To be sure, foreign aid can be useful. Certain disaster relief can provide victims of natural disasters relief and comfort. Certain military and security aid can be used to support the foreign policy goals of the U.S. Some humanitarian aid may actually help to relieve the conditions of poverty for some of the world's poor. And even development aid can help emerging democracies struggling to develop free markets establish sound commercial codes and the rule of law through a sound and independent judiciary. But while there is a minimal propensity to do good, foreign aid has the opportunity to do great harm to developing countries. While foreign aid dedicated specifically to disaster relief, military and security initiatives, and humanitarian assistance may provide marginal benefits, it is the largest portion of the aid program, development assistance, that warrants the most critical analysis.

The Agency for International Development (the U.S. agency in charge of administering the U.S. aid program) states that, "USAID expects its activities to encourage stability rather than crisis, convert poverty to prosperity, and open closed economies and societies" (from, "U.S. Agency for International Development — Strategic Plan" USAID, Washington, D.C., September 1997, p.1). AID's own stated mission: "USAID contributes to U.S. national interests through the results [emphasis added] it delivers by supporting the people of developing and transitional countries in their efforts to achieve enduring economic and social progress and to participate more fully in resolving the problems of their countries and the world" (ibid). Yet, as mentioned in article #2 on this site, AID has a dismal track record at achieving "results" in promoting economic growth in less developed countries.

Go To Page: 1 2 3 4


The copyright of the article Why Nations Develop in Political Economy is owned by . Permission to republish Why Nations Develop in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

55.   Mar 22, 1998 8:14 PM
As I posted in the Liberalism discussion that probably went too far, I am reposting my message here:

I have been loath to jump in and start telling people how they
should be acting i ...


-- posted by Lawhawk


54.   Mar 21, 1998 10:01 PM
You obviously left academic because you couldn't utter anything particularly coherent.

-- posted by pseudoerasmus


53.   Mar 21, 1998 4:57 PM
Alex,
After this post, you have the right to have the last word. Please use it and we can all drop this nonsense.

A) Zeno's paradox was used to show you your own illlogical line of thought. ...

-- posted by RickR


52.   Mar 21, 1998 8:31 AM
Russell

You're still blathering. This Zeno's Paradox business is a complete diversion. You said something basically ignorant and illiterate, yet could not back it up except with this incoherent A ...


-- posted by pseudoerasmus


51.   Mar 20, 1998 3:16 PM
Alexander,

I'm going to give up. You think in a box, you write in a box. As to Zeno, epsilon-delta is a sufficent answer, Leibniz touched on an answer. NSA is the simplest methodology yet develop ...

-- posted by RickR





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Bryan Johnson's Political Economy topic, please visit the Discussions page.