Lollardy posed a threat to the Church because some members of the nobility, (including some at the King's Court), were attracted to Lollard ideas. The initial rise of the movement depended upon gentry, such as Sir Thomas Latimer and Sir John Montague, taking the scholarly arguments of Wycliffe and his followers out into the world of everyday politics. Between 1384 and 1396, in addition to the Wycliffe Bible, a large compilation known as the Floretum was produced and widely circulated. This suggests that money and organization were available.
During the 14th century (and into the 15th), the Church was the sole authority on the Bible, and it was usually its interpretation of the Bible that permeated society. At a time when there was plenty of criticism of the Papacy and the clergy, Wycliffe had gone a step further. He stated that the clergy should be separated from secular matters so that they could concentrate on spiritual affairs. Lollards wanted the clergy to live off alms and their own labor, rather than from the labors of others. Their concern was that the clergy had become so caught up in secular affairs that they had forgotten their spiritual obligations.
From the 1380s the church authorities gradually defined more tightly what counted as correct belief (orthodoxy). They condemned the following beliefs as heretical: the substance of the communion bread remained after the priest had consecrated it; it was not necessary to confess one's sins to a priest; anyone (including women and laypeople) could have the authority to preach. The writings of John Wycliffe were identified as an important source of these heresies. Such developments contributed to the anxieties of the church that heresy was undermining their authority, leading to prosecutions in the late fourteenth and fifteenth centuries against those called Lollards, and the prohibition in 1409 of religious books and theological discussion in English.
Go To Page: 1 2
| Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: | View all related messages |
For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Phyllis Agronsky's British Royal Dynasties topic, please visit the Discussions page.