The second issue to consider is the final product or end result. What format do you like to use in order to view your images? In order to get any enjoyment out of slides you will need a projector and screen or at leas a lightbox or light table. Most people are accustomed to viewing prints and trust me after a few impromptu slide shows that you have tricked your friends into sitting through, they will probably not be back. If however, you are planning to submit your images to a magazine or stock house then slide film is the way to go. But then if that was the case you wouldn't need to ask, right?
The third issue is solely on ability. Slide film has very little latitude which means that it is a sort of WYSIWYG. (What you see is what you get.) No lab gremlins can tune-up your prints to give you a boost of self esteem when your exposure was less than perfect. Learning to use slide film correctly takes a lot of practice and even the pros stick to their own personal favorites and dedicate a lot of time to learning to use it to their best advantage.
The fourth consideration is in the storage of the final product. No doubt about it, slides are much easier to store and take up a lot less space. However, careful attention must be given to the storage of slides as they are the final end product. If they get damaged there are no backups. With prints, you can always make more prints. Slide duplication is a hassle and often quite expensive if you only need one or too.
The fifth consideration concerns cost. Slide film is more expensive to purchase and the development can also be more costly depending on your location and where you have it developed. People often mistakenly think that slide film is cheaper to shoot but it just isn't a correct assumption.
Go To Page: 1 2
| Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: | View all related messages |
For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Wendy Folse's Photography topic, please visit the Discussions page.