lines and phrases used over and over. So painters
should paint only one nude? So in my work, certain
objects and symbols present themselves, and I'm
grateful for that.
B M S: I used to think - and I probably still do -
that all art, including poetry, is essentially
religious in nature. I'm not talking about churches or
codes of ethics or bibles and born-again christians.
I mean something that is essentially spiritual. Do you
see art in these terms? If so, why, and if not, why
not?
RZ: No not all art. Much art is propaganda... like
the stuff produced by the Nazis, and it's difficult to
see the spiritual in street-long portraits of the
various dictators that have haunted us for so many
years, and the verses that have been written in their
honour. Or in those awful portraits of aristocrats
that hang in galleries the world over... or The Last
Supper; sentimental and anaemic... Tribal art and
naive, yes, redolent with spirit... and urban
poetry... the last few hundred years... there is I
think a kind of secular spirituality. I don't really
want to talk about Verlaine and all, and Wilde, and
later the Beats... they've been written about so much
I almost don't care. But there's an obvious
spirituality running through that link to the past.
William Carlos Williams, yes and Lorca, and oh so
many. As for my own stuff... it's an attempt to cut
the top off god's head, to stop time, to see from
outside time... to see things as they are... from
beyond blood flesh and mind... without neurosis and
preconceptions... yeah to see what's in god's head...
(laughs)
B M S: A poet I know recently referred to you as one
of the great unknown love poets of the fin de siecle.
What's your reaction to this?
RZ: [Shifts position, remains silent for two minutes
longer than is comfortable] Well... I agree that I'm
unknown. Uhhhh... is there a kind of barb in there?
Some sarcasm...?
B M S: No, no. Not at all. (laughs)
RZ: The fin de siecle? Verlaine? Rimbaud?
Decadence? Art for art's sake? If I accept that statement
as a compliment it's because... ok, yes, I can see where
he/she may be coming from with regard to the use of
simple language, a need to point to the sacredness of
The copyright of the article The near interview of Richard Z - Page 4 in Performance Poetry is owned by . Permission to republish The near interview of Richard Z - Page 4 in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
7.
Oct 23, 2005 1:48 AM
Richard died today (Saturday 22) at around 11:35am in the Pasque Hospice in Luton UK. He collapsed on his way to work on 28 July 2005, and was two months later diagnosed with cancer of the pancre ...
-- posted by stoneking31
6.
Sep 28, 2001 9:15 AM
..letting zola speak may NOT benefit everyone...i've been asked by an irate pedant nameless out of charity... to correct a statement i made in the interview...guernsey never has been and never will be ...
-- posted by danceswithwinos
5.
Aug 30, 2001 3:18 AM
What moves through Richard Zola is geniune. The ideas that encircle his manifestations possess the Shakesperian-Shaman pyramids. We can hardly say more. There is no more room. Let Zola speak, let the ...
-- posted by Swishonvey
4.
Aug 1, 2001 6:24 PM
In response to message posted by danceswithwinos:
I can't express this as eloquently as Billy and Richard, but no, I don't thi ...
-- posted by poeticinspre
3.
Jul 6, 2001 10:25 PM
inga...heaney uses a fishing analogy and appears to suggest that to write poetry you have to be old...old men by a river bank spitting tobacco juice and understanding worms...he also refers to the mem ...
-- posted by danceswithwinos
For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to
Billy Marshall Stoneking's
Performance Poetry topic, please visit the Discussions page.