Who REALLY Built The Taj Mahal? - Page 2


© Maria Christensen
Page 2
Here is where the story gets really interesting. Recent Hindu scholars claim that Shah Jahan never actually built the Taj Mahal, but merely claimed an existing structure for his own use. This structure was a Hindu temple palace dedicated to the god Shiva and the original name for it was Tejo Mahalaya. One argument in favor of this theory states that the Hindu name is much closer to the name of Taj Mahal than the accepted theory that it is a variation of Mumtaz Mahal's name. In fact, when a woman married an emperor, a new name was chosen for her and debate exists as to whether or not the name which has gone down in recorded history is even the correct one, or merely given after the fact. Other evidence has been produced, including eyewitness accounts of Englishmen in India at the time, statements that there are no construction documents as others have claimed, and that the Koran passages are etched over older Sanskrit writings. An entire book is dedicated to the historical evidence which backs up this theory, and I am not going to attempt to produce all the arguments in this article, as an on-line website by the author, Shri P. N. Oak, covers it very well here.

Suffice it to say that Shah Jahan, whether or not he actually built the Taj Mahal, certainly encouraged and patronized art and architecture and many new buildings went up at his bidding. He also felt it to be his duty to promote Islam and persecute Hindus. Many Hindu temples were destroyed during his reign.

In 1658, he was deposed by his son, Aurangzeb, and spent the next 8 years, until his death, in prison. Some say he was overthrown because he had nearly bankrupted the empire with all his lavish building ventures. Though in time, Aurangzeb would become an even harsher ruler than his father, mercilessly persecuting Hindus, overtaxing his subjects, and helping along the decline of the Mogul Empire. He threw his father into a section of Agra's Red Fort that Shah Jahan had had built, and there the former emperor had at least the consolation of a view of the Taj Mahal from his window, which would comfort him until he joined his late wife in 1666.

In an interesting side note, rumors persist that Shah Jahan had planned for a second Taj Mahal to be built across the river from the first to house his own remains after death. It was to be of black marble and a bridge across the river would connect the two. Another website, here, explains why this is an unlikely theory. It also counters the Hindu temple argument, though not in quite so thorough a fashion as could be hoped for an even debate.

       

Go To Page: 1 2 3


The copyright of the article Who REALLY Built The Taj Mahal? - Page 2 in Asian History is owned by . Permission to republish Who REALLY Built The Taj Mahal? - Page 2 in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

3.   Mar 23, 2000 8:46 PM
Maria,

Thank you for your help. These web pages will really help me with my paper.

Thanks again!!!!!


-- posted by victoria_marie


2.   Mar 23, 2000 2:06 AM
Hi victoria-marie. Thanks for dropping by. Unfortunately, you are going to have a hard time finding material to support the view that the Taj Mahal was originally a Hindu structure. It is a definite m ...

-- posted by mariaandrea


1.   Mar 22, 2000 10:36 PM
I really enjoyed the essay on this subject. I am glad that there are other people out there that believe that the Taj Mahal may not have been built by the Muslims but by ancient Hindus. The only boo ...

-- posted by victoria_marie





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Maria Christensen's Asian History topic, please visit the Discussions page.