Suite101

The Rocky Road to Ratification - Part III


© Christina Coruth

A Lesson in Political Maneuvering

It was left to the legislature in each state to decide the specifics of its Constitutional Convention. John Sullivan, president of the New Hampshire state senate, supported ratification. By convening a special legislative session he was able to spread the word to like-minded senators to attend, which they did. Although the Anti-Federalists made up more than half of the house membership, the members attending the special session were evenly balanced between pro and con. Thomas Bartlett, the speaker of the house, also supported ratification.

A joint committee was appointed. Both sides were evenly represented in the Bartlett's group of appointees. Senate appointees to the committee were Federalists. The committee recommendations for New Hampshire's Convention favored the Federalists.

The committee set the location in Exeter, a pro constitutional town, on February 13.It was believed that at least six states including Massachusetts would have voted for ratification by then. The number of delegates elected by each town or class of towns would be the same in number as their representatives in the house. Those towns that had refused to elect representatives were still eligible to elect delegates to the Convention. All expenses would be paid by the state. The State's Exclusion Rule, which prohibited appointed state officials from representing their towns in the legislature while holding an appointed office, would not apply to the Convention. Most of those officials were Federalists.

House member Nathaniel Peabody of Atkinson, upon seeing that the recommendations favored the Federalists, attempted to get the number of delegates doubled. If he had succeeded, it was likely that many more Anti-Federalists would have been sent to the Convention. However, since doubling the number of delegates also doubled the cost to the state, his recommendation was defeated.

Anti-Federalists put another strategy into action. They worked on electing Anti-Federalist delegates and binding them with written instructions. While two or three towns managed the same tactic in favor of ratification, there were more than 20 towns that succeeded in sending their delegates to the Convention with instructions to vote "nay."

The success of this strategy unsettled the Federalists. They were faced with the likelihood that the vote at Exeter would defeat ratification. Leaders John Sullivan and John Langdon devised a plan to adjourn the Convention before a vote could be taken if defeat seemed likely. They spread the word to the other pro ratification delegates to arrive as early as possible on February 13 with the intention of calling the Convention to order as soon as a quorum was present (which turned out to be 50 delegates). Thirty-three of the 50 were pro Constitution. Of those 33 delegates, five were also legislators, who had left the legislative session early and unnoticed in order to arrive at the Convention early. Sullivan deliberately ended the legislative session late, thus preventing the early influx of Anti-Federalist legislators who were also delegates.

Go To Page: 1 2 3


The copyright of the article The Rocky Road to Ratification - Part III in New Hampshire is owned by . Permission to republish The Rocky Road to Ratification - Part III in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

8.   Sep 18, 2001 5:33 AM
In response to message posted by Dubh_Sidhe:
Hi Virginia,

I learned so much while I was researching this series. It was a lot of w ...


-- posted by Tina_Coruth


7.   Sep 18, 2001 5:29 AM
In response to message posted by Renie_Burghardt:
Hi Renie,
It's a good thing the Federalists turned out to be the most adept at mak ...

-- posted by Tina_Coruth


6.   Sep 17, 2001 4:49 PM
I am so late. This is a wonderful historical presentation, Tina. You have done a supurb job with this, and I know it was not easily done. I appreciate your hard work and thanks for presenting this. ...

-- posted by Dubh_Sidhe


5.   Sep 17, 2001 3:54 PM
Hi Tina, this is such an interesting series. So the "deal struck" was a great deal for the Federalists! Although I have already read all four parts, I look forward to reading part 4 again, since the ...

-- posted by Renie_Burghardt


4.   Sep 17, 2001 12:20 PM
In response to message posted by Red:
Hi Mary,
I know you will forgive me for not realizing there was a post here. I couldn't unders ...

-- posted by Tina_Coruth





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Christina Coruth's New Hampshire topic, please visit the Discussions page.