How is the Bible useful if I cannot take it literally?


© Arthur C. Ruger

How is the Bible useful if I cannot take it literally?

We live an existence governed by the perceptions of our five senses. We have come to understand that our brains function from both a left and right side. The left-brain is primarily an interpreter of facts - an encyclopedia of personally acquired knowledge and experience. The right brain, the creative and imaginative side, is the source of our music, poetry and inventions.

Both sides of our brains reside in the same cranium and it makes sense that the intent of the Creator is that the two aspects are to be harmonized in use. Through our senses, facts and experience are admitted into our thinking, ordered and collated on the left side of our brain and then conceptualized and understood on the right side.

Furthermore, I'm not aware of any writing, sacred or secular, that advises us to emphasize one side at the expense of the other. Balance and harmony of perception seems the path of our spiritual and physical evolution to wisdom and a higher spiritual plane.

Jesus' criticisms of the priestly class are a part of New Testament scripture. He was at times quite caustic, indignant and outrageous in his effort to deal with a society in which the literal interpretation of scripture had gone to the extreme.

The letter of the Law was the basis for social behavior and decision-making. The spirit of the Law, despite the presence of scripture, tradition and history, was not. Fear of the priesthood was the basis for acceptance and validation and an impetus for feeling fear of both the priesthood and one's peers or neighbors.

The letter and spirit of the Law were not balanced. Left brain thinking with its collection of facts assembled into a knowledge of the "world as it is" almost totally overruled the wisdom that is formed in the right brain based on a creative compiling of facts contained in the left: "the world as it ought to be; the world intended by God."

Jesus did not come to write new laws or overthrow old ones. Rather to teach again the need for wisdom and understanding regarding the laws of a God who had been reduced to two-dimensional form: a judgmental divinity who was either pleased or displeased.

We are equipped to see in three dimensions: height, width and depth. Without three-dimensional vision, we see only a square instead of a box and a circle instead of a sphere.

Go To Page: 1 2 3


The copyright of the article How is the Bible useful if I cannot take it literally? in Liberal Christianity is owned by . Permission to republish How is the Bible useful if I cannot take it literally? in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

10.   Jun 12, 2004 9:42 AM
Marcus Borg speaks of two viewpoints about who wrote the Bible. Literal fundamentalists tend to believe the Bible to be an inerrant and infallible collection of declarations of God to man. In DeMille’ ...

-- posted by ArthurRuger


9.   Jun 17, 2002 3:36 PM
In response to message posted by Phil_J:

I very much agree. I've written a two-part article around feminism and the patriarcha ...


-- posted by ArthurRuger


8.   Jun 17, 2002 11:29 AM
In consideration of the question your article asks about the Bible being useful, let me add that it is most useful when it is taken in the mythological sense rather than in the literal sense.
...

-- posted by Phil_J


7.   Jun 17, 2002 11:22 AM
An interesting article even if it was a little hard for me to follow. (Nothing against the writing--more against me.)

I've come to be very interested in New Christianity. And, I've been try ...


-- posted by Phil_J


6.   Jun 2, 2002 1:06 PM
In response to message posted by Treeman:

From my own perspective, the fundamentalist striving to become the official and auth ...


-- posted by ArthurRuger





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Arthur C. Ruger's Liberal Christianity topic, please visit the Discussions page.