The Laziness of Biblical Literalism - Page 4


© Arthur C. Ruger
Page 4
Sister Joan Chittister has called into question the hypocrisy of activism against abortion in America while at the same time supporting the killing of men, women (including pregnant mothers) and children in Iraq, Darfur and other places.

Bloggers and Internet editors have raised these same questions publicly and few if any of those challenged have tried to justify or reconcile actions, decisions and behavior with the teachings of Christ.

On message boards of all sorts - including the discussion boards on this site - we encounter disagreement and apologist reasoning based mostly on again an insistence that "How do I know? The Bible tells me so."

More and more, the disparity between Christian biblical literalists and liberals is widening. In a very real way, the two groups no longer have the Bible predominantly in common as was the case in the past. Letter-of-the-law Christians find themselves stuck in a place where they can only defend their "truth" from within their walls and from their turrets of either-or. The current political power base that has moved many Christians to the Right must sustain itself by somehow stopping the pendulum from swinging the other way as more and more the hypocrisy of Radical Christian reasoning becomes publically obvious.

When cornered, the lazy Christians can only throw the Book at critics. And unfortunately, regardless of pretending otherwise, the Book is not the exclusive property of the self-appointed select elite.

Go To Page: 1 2 3 4


The copyright of the article The Laziness of Biblical Literalism - Page 4 in Liberal Christianity is owned by . Permission to republish The Laziness of Biblical Literalism - Page 4 in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

111.   Sep 28, 2005 8:30 AM
In response to Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Not All Literalists ... posted by Satirie:

You said, "I literally believe God created the ...


-- posted by mordrell


110.   Feb 17, 2005 10:39 PM
In response to Re: Re: Re: Re: Literalist = Literal? A question.... posted by ArthurRuger:

:)LOL:)...!!.. nice... I suppose ...


-- posted by _Boanerges_


109.   Feb 17, 2005 9:38 PM
In response to Re: Re: Re: Literalist = Literal? A question.... posted by _Boanerges_:

Well literal or not with that tail ha ...


-- posted by ArthurRuger


108.   Feb 17, 2005 8:03 PM
In response to Re: Re: Literalist/Fundamentalist posted by Satirie:

question about; literalists, or literal.. or, maybe, fun ...


-- posted by _Boanerges_


107.   Feb 17, 2005 7:15 PM
In response to Re: Literalist/Fundamentalist posted by ArthurRuger:

...the use of Biblical verses in a literalistic "one ...


-- posted by Satirie





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Arthur C. Ruger's Liberal Christianity topic, please visit the Discussions page.