|
|||
|
Page 4
Sister Joan Chittister has called into question the hypocrisy of activism against abortion in America while at the same time supporting the killing of men, women (including pregnant mothers) and children in Iraq, Darfur and other places.
Bloggers and Internet editors have raised these same questions publicly and few if any of those challenged have tried to justify or reconcile actions, decisions and behavior with the teachings of Christ. On message boards of all sorts - including the discussion boards on this site - we encounter disagreement and apologist reasoning based mostly on again an insistence that "How do I know? The Bible tells me so." More and more, the disparity between Christian biblical literalists and liberals is widening. In a very real way, the two groups no longer have the Bible predominantly in common as was the case in the past. Letter-of-the-law Christians find themselves stuck in a place where they can only defend their "truth" from within their walls and from their turrets of either-or. The current political power base that has moved many Christians to the Right must sustain itself by somehow stopping the pendulum from swinging the other way as more and more the hypocrisy of Radical Christian reasoning becomes publically obvious. When cornered, the lazy Christians can only throw the Book at critics. And unfortunately, regardless of pretending otherwise, the Book is not the exclusive property of the self-appointed select elite.
The copyright of the article The Laziness of Biblical Literalism - Page 4 in Liberal Christianity is owned by . Permission to republish The Laziness of Biblical Literalism - Page 4 in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Arthur C. Ruger's Liberal Christianity topic, please visit the Discussions page. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||