|
|||
|
Page 3
Mr. Dobson/Focus on the Family and their "war" against Spongebob Squarepants with their declared rational typify this laziness. Driven by Dobson's Rhetoric I suspect that the literalist psychology comes into play with biblical passages about raising children "in the Lord" and the like.
Those swayed by the anti-cartoon rhetoric might possibly have some sense that their child's relationship with anyone outside the family - at that tender toddling age - could somehow compete with the intimate harmony of the family in a home setting where spiritual brainwashing is so powerfully accomplished as a normal part of growing up. Such a concern might be more legitimate as the children get older - say nearer the pre-pubescent junior-high-school ages when peer pressure mounts with terrifying rapidity. In a home where a dissatisfied Christian conscience possibly acknowledges that the family life has not been "perfect" as idealized in every Christian congregation, the parents justifiably -in their heart of hearts - sense that forcing religion on children may not have been the best way. Communicating religious dogma and doctrine is a hell of a lot easier than communicating a spiritual sense of ethical morality and doing good for the sake of goodness. How many kids grow up in so-called Christian homes having reached a point of tuning out the preaching? How many have grown up admiring their parents but struggling with a sense of quiet desperation in not living up to an unreasonable standard of "righteousness" that has made so many Christian clergy-celebrities rich and so many families torn? Recently, as I have participated and contended with critics of a liberal Christian point of view, I have realized that the fortress of justification for that criticism is in reality a quite small edifice. It's walls of protection and the moat surrounding it are all constructed by a lazy insistence on the absolutely inerrant Bible. Every day these literalists - especially the celebrity literalists such as Dobson, Falwell, Robertson - even George Bush - are challenged on their dogmatic declarations. Every day, it seems, someone somewhere publicly requests theological and scriptural justifications for actions and viewpoints that contradict the teachings of Christ. To name a few: Jim Wallis and his liberal Sojourners organization;
The copyright of the article The Laziness of Biblical Literalism - Page 3 in Liberal Christianity is owned by . Permission to republish The Laziness of Biblical Literalism - Page 3 in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Arthur C. Ruger's Liberal Christianity topic, please visit the Discussions page. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||