Suite101

The Laziness of Biblical Literalism


© Arthur C. Ruger

"For activist leaders of the radical religious right, the Bible isn't so much a spiritual guide as an ammunitions storehouse. Verses are handpicked from here and there (carefully ignoring those scriptures that might get in the way of their own "godly" image and political ambitions) to justify whatever they want to do.

And since there are commands in various parts of the Bible to do terrible things that Jesus never condoned--like stoning your rebellious children to death, or stoning gay people, or killing everyone in an enemy's village except the young virginal girls...well clearly, there's something for everyone, no matter how cruel, no matter how vile.

... So how did Jesus get demoted, and why? A reading of the gospels will make that quickly apparent. The Sermon on the Mount alone is enough to rattle those who use the Bible to enforce their personal prejudices.

Jesus was a troublemaker in his days and in ours because he stood up for those who were reviled and persecuted by religious authorities under the banner of faith. He taught people the Good News: That they should see God as a compassionate, accepting parent to love, not as an angry, violent, punitive authority figure to fear." -Dr. Teresa Whitehurst, The Christian Minority Coalition

Whether you see Jesus as the God-become-mortal or as one of the most powerful great teachers and sages in human history, one important question in this current time of religious controversy needs to be more seriously addressed. As the "founder" of Christianity did Jesus intentionally establish or lay the groundwork for a formal organization from within which would evolve doctrine and dogma written in irrevocable heavenly granite?

Historical human propensity seems to have viewed the "civilization" of a society or culture in terms of formal construction of rigid rules, cultural mores and an insistence on blind but trusting conformity. Everyone must do what the "founders" have said and written - as if those founders sat around in some sort of marathon sessions out of which the documentation and authority of the group evolved.

Most religious human beings affiliated with a formal belief set within a culture or society tend to stand on the sort of documented and authorized orthodoxy that forever looks back for assurance rather than forward with hope.

Disagreement and/or disapproval of the behavior of fellow members, fellow citizens or outsiders then tends to find its basis in that backward looking framework of orthodoxy. Concerns about "education" of children and proselytes to the culture have to do with instilling that which is limited to what can only be seen through the rear-view mirror upon which is based definitions of what is seen through the windshield as movement forward continues.

Go To Page: 1 2 3 4


The copyright of the article The Laziness of Biblical Literalism in Liberal Christianity is owned by . Permission to republish The Laziness of Biblical Literalism in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

111.   Sep 28, 2005 8:30 AM
In response to Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Not All Literalists ... posted by Satirie:

You said, "I literally believe God created the ...


-- posted by mordrell


110.   Feb 17, 2005 10:39 PM
In response to Re: Re: Re: Re: Literalist = Literal? A question.... posted by ArthurRuger:

:)LOL:)...!!.. nice... I suppose ...


-- posted by _Boanerges_


109.   Feb 17, 2005 9:38 PM
In response to Re: Re: Re: Literalist = Literal? A question.... posted by _Boanerges_:

Well literal or not with that tail ha ...


-- posted by ArthurRuger


108.   Feb 17, 2005 8:03 PM
In response to Re: Re: Literalist/Fundamentalist posted by Satirie:

question about; literalists, or literal.. or, maybe, fun ...


-- posted by _Boanerges_


107.   Feb 17, 2005 7:15 PM
In response to Re: Literalist/Fundamentalist posted by ArthurRuger:

...the use of Biblical verses in a literalistic "one ...


-- posted by Satirie





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Arthur C. Ruger's Liberal Christianity topic, please visit the Discussions page.