TELLING OLD TALES AGAIN: MUPPETS CHRISTMAS CAROL, OF MICE AND MEN


© Sean Gallagher
Articles in this Topic    Discussions in this Topic
Page 2
Still, this is an enjoyable retelling of the classic tale. Except for the Muppet-related things, there are few liberties with Dickens' tale, and Henson doesn't make the mistake of making it self-concsiously literary. THE MUPPET CHRISTMAS CAROL won't stand up with the Alistair Sim version, but it's a nice version both kids and adults should enjoy.

OF MICE AND MEN is also a tale of simplicity, and since there was an excellent version in 1939, with Burgess Meredith and Lon Chaney Jr., one wonders why another version was necessary. The answer is Sinise and writer Horton Foote make this simple and powerful, and a worthy version of Steinbeck's tale.

Anyone who's ever had high school English knows the tale; it's of two drifters in Depression-era California, Lennie (John Malkovich), who works hard but is dim-witted, so much that he never understands the trouble he's getting into, and George (Sinise), who takes care of Lennie, even when he doesn't want to. They dream of making enough money so they can have their own place, and Lennie can tend rabbits. But because Lennie is always getting into trouble since he doesn't understand things, they are forced to move from place to place. At this particular farm, they get jobs, George fits in well with the other men, and Lennie gets by because whatever his faults, he's a hard worker who does what he's told. But then there's the vicious foreman Curly (Casey Siemaszko), who doesn't like Lennie cause he's bigger than he is, and Curly's wife (Sherilyn Fenn), who shamelessly flirts with the other men, probably because Curly hates it so. And those elements will spell trouble for George and Lennie.

As a director, Sinise is careful and spare. He doesn't belabor the beautiful country, nor does he overdo how hard things were in general then. And he and Foote also take a simple, uninsisting approach to the characters as well, making small arguments instead of hitting us over the head with big statements. We see, for example, that Curly's wife is lonely and bored, and dreams of a better world, so that we don't hate her for stirring up trouble. And similarly, while Sinise and Foote are interested in the plight of the aging (Ray Walston is an old hand named Candy, who keeps a dog around because, like him, he's old and lonely) and of other races (Joe Morton is Crooks, the stable hand, who keeps his distance because he knows what's in store for him if he doesn't), they similarly make their points through character and plot, rather than through statements. And all of this is done while staying close to Steinbeck's novel.

Go To Page: 1 2 3


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo