I, personally, think this is a good thing. To say anything different is to trample on the idea of women as career-oriented individuals and, once again, to relegate the role of "breadwinner" to men. The fact of the matter is, of course, that both mother and father are equally well-suited to careers outside the home and both should be equal partners in rearing children (whether as stay at home parents or as professionals employed outside the home who see their children after 5:00 p.m.).
The message to women who work outside the home seems to be "if you choose not to be at home all day with your children, you forfeit the right to get kids involved in the many wonderful courses and activities available to the children of stay at home moms."
Even more irritating is that your CHILD misses out on taking classes, whether it is gymnastics, introduction to music, theater, or whatever, simply because her SELFISH mother chose to have a career - rather than to stay at home all day.
And, let's face it, working women STILL have go home in the evening and cook, clean and take care of children, even if their children are in daycare during the days.
In short, mothers who work outside the home should have the SAME options as stay-at-home mothers with respect to enrolling children in classes and activity groups. This is to say that given that women are working outside the home in substantial numbers, evening courses and weekend courses should be readily available.
I know that I am every bit as committed, as devoted, and as nurturing a mother as any stay-at-home-mother. I do not buy into that I am somehow "less" devoted to motherhood by virtue of my having a career.
Go To Page: 1 2
| Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: | View all related messages |
For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Jody Hart Lehrer's Motherless Mothering topic, please visit the Discussions page.