"Kate" Books Plagued By Flat Characters, Too Many Coincidences


© Eric Jordan Jensen
Articles in this Topic    Discussions in this Topic

Everything seems to be pushing against 16-year-old Kate Erickson until the force of an oncoming car hurls her into a coma. As her body slips into unconsciousness, her mind takes her back in time. Suddenly, she finds herself crossing the plains with her fourth great-grandmother. As she endures the exhausting journey, she comes to love her ancestors and embrace the Gospel that is all-important to them. She emerges from the coma with a fierce desire to realign herself with Church standards, but the task becomes extremely difficult when her peers, both members and non-members, refuse to accept her sudden turnaround. How can she convince them of her sincerity when no one seems able to let go of the past? As Kate struggles to repent of previous misdeeds, she hits constant roadblocks which threaten to hinder her way, but finally emerges triumphant.

Cheri J. Crane’s series of “Kate” books–Kate’s Turn, Kate’s Return(1996) and Forever Kate(1997) and Following Kate–tell of the protagonist’s transformation from a rebellious, foul-mouthed kid into a pure and strong adult. She stumbles through trials many LDS teens face, such as drug use, alcohol abuse, sexual temptation and peer pressure. Through it all, Kate learns to rely on her Heavenly Father as well as her earthly family, all of whom support her efforts to change her life for the better.

While Crane bravely tackles several taboo, but important, subjects, her books plod along, relying on flat characters and hard-to-believe coincidences to keep the readers’ attention. The characters ring hollow (with the possible exception of Ian Campbell), lacking traits that make them memorable. Kate’s parents and the rest of the cast could be anyone and no one, so completely generic are they. Even Kate seems to be a conglomeration of popular heroines (think Scarlett O’Hara and Anne Shirley), without any identifying habits of her own. Her flashing green eyes and quick temper can be found in so many other ladies in literature that they cease to be endearing in the star of Crane’s novels. Unfortunately, the only character that stands out in these novels, the aforementioned Ian Campbell, provides the cliche of all cliches: he is a wheelchair-bound accountant who uses humor to cover the pain of his disability, while bravely combating his everyday battles. Perhaps I am being too harsh as the reader will find some sparks from characters such as Harriet Kearns, Heidi Kearns and Lyle Jennings. Overall, however, the people in Crane’s novels provide about as much insight as a fortune cookie. Almost as annoying as her characters is Crane’s quick use of coincidence to create and tie up weak plot lines. The reader will groan to find out that Kate serves a mission in Scotland, where she conveniently runs into her cousin, who provides all of the answers to Kate’s gnawing genealogical questions. And, of course, there is Mike, who supposedly married while Kate was on her mission: Only Kate is surprised to find the engagement broken and Mike still available; the reader knew it all along.

Go To Page: 1 2


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo