|
|
|
|
|
The development of independent labour politics can be attributed to a variety of reasons. Chief among these must be the perceived need for labour representation in parliament. This representation was sought as a way to promote certain legislation embodying socialist principles with an undisguised aim to improve conditions for working class people. While this would attract support from a sector of the working class it generated only mild interest for some of the demands from other sections of the population and the most socialist ideas were feared by the middle class. Socialism was seen as a threat to their way of life and they associated it with Bolshevism and revolution.
The labour movement continued to meet with more success south of the border. As Hutchison says ‘The steady and persistent work of local labour parties is not so marked in Scotland as in England’(1). Additional reasons for this are the divide that existed in Scotland between the socialists and the trade unionists and the lack of effective organisation. After the WEC began to break down it really only contained the ILP and consequently it became more socialist. In Glasgow where the ILP had their greatest support their municipalising schemes were unpopular with the middle class who suffered under higher rates consequently the ILP lost seats. In 1910 Labour fought 11 seats in Scotland and won only two, in England they won 38 seats out of 67 contested. Hutchison suggests there was ‘not a great deal of evidence that Labour voters were attracted by socialist ideals’(2). Also many policies such as municipilisation were accepted by the Liberals and they nominated some social radicals as candidates in order to capture labour voters. Go To Page: 1 2
The copyright of the article The Rise of Labour Politics (Chapter Two) in Modern Scottish History is owned by Simon Hill. Permission to republish The Rise of Labour Politics (Chapter Two) in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
|
|
|
|