Times That Try Men's Souls


© John Lovett
Articles in this Topic    Discussions in this Topic

I have received several e-mails over the last two weeks or so asking me if I was still alive. Ah, yes I am. I have extremely busy over the past four weeks. Working on a new motion picture? I wish. Actually, what I have been doing is putting the finishing touches on a screenplay that is currently in production by Merrick Productions ( http://www.gbnwork.com/gbn_communication... ), negotiating with my agent on a Civil War drama, writing a new screenplay, and re - vamping the Hollywood Military Advisor web site ( http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Set/7... ). By the way, if you have ever wondered what I look like, go to the Pictures page at the CATHY MORGAN site. Yes, that's me sitting in the pilot's seat of a 1947 Aercoupe.

Here's some stray voltage I would like to share with you. If you remember from my articles about Stars Wars, I mentioned that I found it interesting that motion pictures often represent a technical advanced military as being bone stupid when it calls for that technology being implemented in any meaningful way. The example of Star Wars fits that observation. In the first three films, you observe the various Stormtroopers getting their collective wherewithal stomped by various low technology resistance fighters. In the latest offering, THE PHANTOM MENACE, you observe the planet Naboo being invaded by high technology warrior robots that are defeated by low technology amphibians.

An observation I would like to make is that a technologically inept civilization cannot exhibit signs of being both technologically advanced and technologically stupid. Notice I did not say technologically backward. You can have a society that is technologically advanced and backward at the same time. The filmmaker must chose one route or another. He cannot have it both ways. I mention this phenomena because of the movie THE THIRTEEN WARRIOR. Based on the excellent Michael Chrichton book Eaters of the Dead, the film involves an Arab poet by the name of Ahmahd ibn Fahdalan that is chosen to be the thirteenth member of a group of Nordic warriors traveling to help a village being attacked by the Flesh Eaters.

Understand this, Chrichton's book explains who he thinks the Flesh Eaters were and why they did what they did and what happened to them. The movie does none of those things. In the process of this movie, we find out the Flesh Eaters are CHUDS (cannibalistic humanoid underground dwellers - all right I stole that name from a truly terrible science fiction movie, but I think the title fits). For effect, they wear bear capes and attack with stealth and strategy. They also ride horses.

       

Go To Page: 1 2


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

7.   Oct 25, 1999 8:30 PM
Quite so. And the Mongols made connections between technologies too. For example, using their captured Chinese catapults to launch barrels full of Chinese firecrackers into ranks of European knights, ...

-- posted by LER


6.   Oct 25, 1999 2:38 PM
Lee,

Your example of the Mongols is interesting. I did not think of that group of people while writing the article. However, the Mongols did recognize technology when they found it and used it wh ...


-- posted by HMAGUY


5.   Oct 24, 1999 9:16 PM
Yes, this is why I specified the V-2.

-- posted by LER


4.   Oct 24, 1999 8:58 PM
The V-1 wasn't, it was actually a flying bomb. It was lanuched from catapult ramps or from aircraft. It went about 150+mph and carried a 2000lb warhead. The V-2 was a ballistic missile and the first ...

-- posted by steelcat


3.   Oct 24, 1999 8:26 AM
You are correct in mentioning the Mongol's use of conquered peoples as local administrators. And, while I agree the Mongols didn't try to kill everyone in their AO, surrendering your town to them wasn ...

-- posted by LER





Join the latest discussions

For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to John Lovett's Military Movies topic, please visit the Discussions page.