Suite101

Anger=Suffering


© lawhawk

Some of you have probably wondered what has caused my change in tone in recent months. Many of you know that I lived in NYC for most of my life and currently work in the shadow of the WTC. I saw the towers just before they were hit - and just after the first tower was struck - not knowing what was going on.

Anger has given way to weariness and sadness over the whole WTC attack, but once in a while anger creeps back into my consciousness when I hear reports about how the US Administration has stumbled and bumbled over information in its possession that could protect my fellow citizens from further attacks. I am also angered when hearing about the so called "War on Terrorism" that President Bush initially claimed would go after states that support and harbor terrorists, yet today we are no closer to going after those terrorist states than we were in September.

Instead, we've seen the US try to keep India from lashing out at Pakistan because Pakistan has fueled the Islamic fundamentalists in Kashmir into inciting cross-border attacks that might lead to a catastrophic war between two nuclear nations that share a common border. This conflict could potentially devastate the South Asian subcontinent and affect hundreds of millions of people - most of whom only vaguely know what is going on in the first place. The US has supported Pakistan time and time again even though Pakistan has shown that it doesn't have the slightest inclination to take the truly necessary steps of clamping down on terrorists and funding those folks who harbored our friends in Al Quaeda in the first place - the Taliban. The US basically bribed Pakistan into this 'war on terrorism,' yet we've not gotten all that we bargained for.

Meanwhile, India (far from being a religious tolerate nation in its own right, but a democratic one nonetheless) has been dealing with religious extremists since the British left town in 1948. They've fought three wars with Pakistan over the Kashmir since then, and with both India and Pakistan possessing nuclear arms and missiles that can strike deep into both countries, no one in either country is safe - especially if Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf's government is overthrown by extremists if the armed forces do poorly against the Indian army (which also happens to out gun and out man the Pakistani army by a 2:1 margin). The US would be wise to call upon China and Russia, the Pakistani and Indian backers, to urge restraint and move away from the precipice.

Go To Page: 1 2


The copyright of the article Anger=Suffering in Middle East Politics is owned by . Permission to republish Anger=Suffering in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

1.   Jun 28, 2002 9:39 PM
apart from a number of other faults - standard middle US prejudices - is there any evidence that a majority or even a large minority of the peoples you name have any desire for peace? Do US citizens ...

-- posted by jacob069





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to lawhawk's Middle East Politics topic, please visit the Discussions page.