|
|
|
|
|
Negotiations are the foundation and keystone to the peace process. However to examine the peace process and gain a greater understanding for the pressures and stresses the participants are under, one must first understand how they came to their positions and stances in the negotiations in the first place.
For the most part, both sides are arguing from what is referred to as the power bargaining position. Power bargaining does not refer to the strength of the position, but rather the style in which the negotiator chooses to conduct his affairs. Individuals who use this style generally do so because they have one of several concerns: Power bargaining is generally the safest style of negotiating because the negotiator does not have to give up much of his position and can maintain a hard line. This goes for either when you are in the superior or inferior position because they both have the most to gain or lose in their respective positions should they make concessions on the issues basic to their positions. The problem with power bargaining is when you have two power bargainers negotiating. Generally, very little can be accomplished unless one sides modifies their position to that of the problem solver, the other negotiating style. Problem solvers are generally after solving the problems with the least amount of resistance. This means that they will often sacrifice the best possible deal for their side for the sake of sealing the deal. To be continued.... In Other News and NotesIf anyone has any topics or interesting ideas they would like to see covered, want to have me review any new Internet sites covering the Middle East, please let me know and I will try to meet those requests.Go To Page: 1
The copyright of the article Reasonable Responses - Part 1 in Middle East Politics is owned by lawhawk. Permission to republish Reasonable Responses - Part 1 in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
|
|
|
|