Whose Peace Is It Anyway?? - Page 2© lawhawk
Page 2
Oct 17, 1996
It would be quite easy for the parties of the peace process to work out a peace agreement if the religious, moral and political concerns were able to be seperated and treated differently. However, these concerns are all present and affect how the parties interact. My next column will deal with this interaction.
Go To Page:
1
2
The copyright of the article Whose Peace Is It Anyway?? - Page 2 in Middle East Politics is owned by . Permission to republish Whose Peace Is It Anyway?? - Page 2 in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
Alex,The Gulf war was fought, in part, for oil, but that was not the sole reason. The US saw this as an opportunity to expand their interests in the region and felt this was an opportunity ...
|
Thomas SampsonOh, please. Saddam Hussein embodies a secular regime. Islam has got absolutely nothing to do with anything in the situation in the Gulf -- except insofar as S.H. has seen fi ...
-- posted by pseudoerasmus
|
Tom,To address your first point, Iraq invaded Kuwait for one of several possible reasons; to expand and dominate the oil trade in the region and the world, to incorporate Kuwait into Iraq under th ...
|
It is my understanding that this Iraq thing started over the invasion of Kuwait, a holy war, in a sense. Saddam claimed that the Kuwait's people had turned their backs on the Muslim religion, by mode ...
|
Lucee,Israel was formed from the area known as Palestine as a result of two major events; the first being a vote by the United Nations in November 1947 and the second was a war that allowed the Je ...
|
For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to
lawhawk's
Middle East Politics topic, please visit the Discussions page.
|
