Power Politics: Is this really what we want?


© lawhawk

The issue of power politics has come up on several occasions in the threads that accompany Middle East Politics. First of all, "power politics" is a term in political science that is used to denote a situation whereby a country seeks to impose its will on another country through any means at that country's disposal. This can include economic, political and military means.

Power politics has existed for thousands of years and has been a fundamental part of social relationships. It has been used by countries to expand their territorial dominion, change international policy and improve the economic standing of the citizenry. It has been used over and over in the Middle East for thousands of years and continues to be used today.

Despite this, the modern world seeks to infuse the traditional realm of power politics with a moral paradigm. Countries have a duty to their citizenry as well as the citizens of other countries to act in a certain fashion. It seeks to incorporate the moral code that has been reached in a consensual fashion by all the nations of the world through a variety of institutions including the World Court at the Hague, the United Nations and numerous international organizations. This is a very worthy goal since there are many countries that offend the moral consensus and should be censured in some fashion.

This moral code, however, is not adhered to in most cases since the overriding concerns of nationalism, security and freedom from outside control tend to overshadow the advantages of a moral code. Nearly every country on this planet has not adhered to the moral code in some way. Israel, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, United States and Russia are all among the countries that have violated the moral system as it is currently implemented.

The United States regularly disregards the decisions of the International Court of Justice at the Hague; China regularly detains those who oppose the government in power; Iran, Iraq, Israel and Syria are regularly accused of human rights abuses. These actions are all wrong and are denounced by many. They do not, however, change the fact that the world system in which we live cannot force the offending country into changing its behavior without going to war. War appears to be the only way in which offending countries are taught their moral lessons.

That is not to say that I think war is an inevitable part of the world system. It is not. War can be avoided through the honest brokering of disputes between individuals and nations.

Go To Page: 1 2


The copyright of the article Power Politics: Is this really what we want? in Middle East Politics is owned by . Permission to republish Power Politics: Is this really what we want? in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

5.   Apr 16, 1997 2:46 PM
While it is true that the congress did mandate that the embassy be moved to Jerusalem, this is not done yet and the embassy remains in Tel Aviv. Even then, the location of the embassy is paramout. Is ...

-- posted by Rafehh


4.   Apr 15, 1997 6:21 PM
By an act of Congress, the United States will officially move its embassy to Jerusalem. You can check out the reason for the move at the AIPAC website

-- posted by Lawhawk


3.   Apr 15, 1997 5:54 PM
Israel would be wrong to use this argument. Indeed annexation of territory by force is illegal and such is void. The Geneva convention apply to Jerusalem whether it is annexed or not. Indeed, the Gene ...

-- posted by Rafehh


2.   Apr 12, 1997 6:50 PM
The article Mr. Hulays is correct in both its application and description of the Geneva Convention. However, Israel would suggest that it does not apply because the territory in question is not occup ...

-- posted by Lawhawk


1.   Apr 12, 1997 6:14 PM
An article of relevence

Red Cross Attack Israel Settlements

By GENE KRAMER
Associated Press Writer
Thursday, April 10, 1997 3:24 pm EDT


WASHINGTON (AP) -- Construction of Israeli sett ...


-- posted by Rafehh





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to lawhawk's Middle East Politics topic, please visit the Discussions page.