Luther's Sermon on Infant Baptism


© Dr. Martin Luther, Th.D., Reformer, sinner and child of God
Articles in this Topic    Discussions in this Topic
Page 3

25. The holy ancient fathers have spoken somewhat better, although not clearly enough. They say nothing about this imaginary power of the sacraments, but they teach that little children are baptized in the faith of the Christian church. But since they do not explain thoroughly, how this Christian faith benefits the children, whether they thereby receive a faith of their own, or are baptized only upon the Christian faith, without faith of their own: the sophists rush in and interpret the language of the holy fathers to the effect, that children are baptized without faith of their own and receive grace solely by reason of the faith of the church. For they are enemies of faith; if only they can exalt works, faith must allow them to do so. They do not think for a moment, whether the holy fathers erred or they themselves understood the fathers aright.

26. Beware of this poison and error, even if it were the expressed opinion of all the fathers and councils; for it will not stand; it has no Scripture for its foundation, but only the imaginations and dreams of men. Moreover it is directly and manifestly opposed to the chief texts already mentioned, where Christ says: "He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved." The conclusion from this is in short, baptism avails for nobody and is to be administered to nobody, unless he believes for himself; and without faith nobody is to be baptized, as St. Augustine himself says: "Non sacramentum justificat, sed fides sacrament" ("Not the sacrament justifies, but the faith of the sacrament").

27. Besides these there are others, like the brethren called Waldensians. They teach that every one must believe for himself, and receive baptism or the Lord's supper with his own faith; otherwise neither baptism nor the Lord's supper is of any benefit to him. So far they speak and teach correctly. But it is a mockery of holy baptism, when they go on and baptize little children, although they teach that they have no faith of their own. They thus sin against the second commandment, in that they consciously and deliberately take the name and Word of God in vain. Nor does the excuse help them which they plead, that children are baptized upon their future faith, when they come to the age of reason. For the faith must be present before or at least in the baptism; otherwise the child will not be delivered from the devil and sins.

   

Go To Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

7.   Aug 20, 1999 6:16 AM
I picked up a book, which came with a CD, called "Mary Did You Know?" A small book, set up as a gift for Christmas, with blurbs from different Christian writers about Christmas (I was disappointed tha ...

-- posted by H2O


6.   Aug 17, 1999 4:19 AM
the laughter and ease with which I converse with most Protestants today over our differences.

The joy of salvation is important to me.

I wish someone would do an "Essential Luther" with the extr ...


-- posted by StCatherine


5.   Aug 16, 1999 8:05 AM
Would that we had more today who spoke with such straightforwardness. We must also remember that words have changed meanings a great deal in the past 450+ years.

I seem to recall that Jesus tended ...


-- posted by ears4u


4.   Aug 16, 1999 6:25 AM
One of the weaknesses of Luther (and we all need to keep in mind Luther was a sinful human being just like we all are, and he was also justified through the blood of Christ just like we all are) is hi ...

-- posted by H2O


3.   Aug 14, 1999 5:37 AM
My post should have started with a "You know . . ." That's what I was thinking. No a "You." Just a "you" sounds cross, doesn't it? I did not mean to convey "grouchiness." Sorry, about not proofre ...

-- posted by StCatherine





Join the latest discussions

For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Dr. Martin Luther, Th.D., Reformer, sinner and child of God's Lutheranism topic, please visit the Discussions page.