On the whole, the book accomplishes well what it sets out to do, which is to illustrate the value of personal spirituality and faith, while questioning the established religions, discrimination, and the nature of love and faith. Ms. Jernigan's ability to capture the innocence of her protagonist is truly one of the book's strong points, and her ability to display the local color of the south remains remarkable through out the entire book.
The ethical, theological, and individual concerns that she confronts (such as those of faith, race relations, love, religious discrimination, and perseverance) are questions that need asking, but are by no means extremely radical in this day and age. She confronts them with care and with an obvious love for the book that she is writing.
If there is any criticism of the book that needs to be stated, it is that the love story involved as a subplot does not exactly come off, and at times the dialogue between the protagonist and her lover is a bit contrived and too Hollywood for its own good. While the confrontation of the love between the two is essential to the stories confrontation of faith, it does not always come across as a legitimate relationship between people, and it is obvious to the reader that they are reading characters, and not observing people's lives. However, barring this the book on the whole is rather enjoyable to read.
Go To Page: 1 2
| Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: | View all related messages |
For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Shaun Michael Jex's Literary Theory topic, please visit the Discussions page.