Never Trust A Prankster


© Shaun Michael Jex

I am physically unable to walk away from a conversation about literature. I am a chronic addict, and no matter what help or advice I have received to beat it, I cannot quit. I have always been mildly aware of this fact, but at three A.M. last night it became painfully clear. I had to get up early. I had work to do. I was tired, and my body was running on ungodly amounts of coffee, but like some Pavlovian dog, my common sense was over run by the bell ring of literature.

The whole thing began as what should have been nothing more than a simple transaction. I was stopping by a friend’s apartment to exchange short stories for review. Somehow along the way we decided that this wasn’t enough, and that we would stay up all night discussing each other’s work, critiquing and as always, exchanging ideas about literary theory.

The theory that dominated the evening’s discussion was an odd one, and in truth I don’t know if it can actually be called a “literary theory.” If it is, it seems the simplest theory I have ever encountered, and probably the most difficult to actually pull of. Honesty. Pure, painful, raw nerved honesty. The ability to take the most intimate, painful, hidden parts of your life that you would prefer to hide under a rock, and write about them openly. In other words, write what you know. She decided that she would confront me on this issue.

-So, why do you hide behind theory in all of your writing? Why don’t you write about things that you’ve actually lived and experienced? It would come across more authentic if you did. –

Do I hide behind theory? I have never honestly thought of it as “hiding” though I admit that I have a penchant for the abstract in fiction. I have always justified this to myself with several major excuses:

A. I was raised, and have lived the majority of my life, in the upper middle class. Though I, like anyone who lives long enough, have experienced loss, love, death, pain, and all those other things that make our life tediously interesting, they would still be from the point of view of an upper middle class person. "The Catcher in The Rye" was already written some fifty years ago, and if I read about one more book that is called the “Catcher in the Rye for the new Generation” I will promptly shoot myself.

Go To Page: 1 2


The copyright of the article Never Trust A Prankster in Literary Theory is owned by . Permission to republish Never Trust A Prankster in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

3.   Feb 15, 2003 6:32 PM
In response to message posted by Dhalgren13:

So I was just looking for pictures of the pranksters when I found thi ...


-- posted by Jack_Acid


2.   Oct 26, 2001 3:01 PM
In response to message posted by Dhalgren13:

I will merely state at this juncture that Walt Whitman was perhaps th ...


-- posted by Dhalgren13


1.   Oct 24, 2001 4:16 PM
This was posted on my comments, and after checking with the author (named Pogo) they cleared me to post it:

A brief rebuttal
A basic principle of “good writing” is to avoid mixed metaphors, as th ...


-- posted by Dhalgren13





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Shaun Michael Jex's Literary Theory topic, please visit the Discussions page.