The list of winners, announced last week, usually draws a wide range of Monday-morning commentary. How did the winners excel? Did they deserve it? Yeah, sure, that was good work, but what about so-and-so?
At the moment, the analysis and behind-the-scenes coverage are a bit sparse. But more is surely on the way. The Columbia Journalism Review (www.cjr.org), the American Journalism Review (www.ajr.org) and others undoubtedly will offer additional coverage in the days ahead.
For now, however, here's a short list of Pulitzer-related links:
Here you'll find the list of winners, from the official source.
Click on the big 2001, and you'll be taken to the winners in journalism and other categories, plus information on the runners-up. Click on old Joe the dynamo and you'll be whisked to a history of the prizes. The site also features a searchable archive of all the winners since 1917.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/art...
Here, Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz provides a rundown of the winners. You'll also find an easy-to-navigate list of links to the winners, a Webcast of the announcements, and more.
http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian...
Here you'll find the Portland Oregonian's coverage of the Pulitzers arriving at its doorstep -- one for public service and one for feature writing.
http://www.brillscontent.com/2000june/fe...
In this June 2000 piece, Brill's Content tells the story of soon-to-be-winner David Willman and his coverage of unsafe prescription drugs for The Los Angeles Times.
http://www.brillscontent.com/2000oct/dep...
From October 2000, a Brill's Content article about Charles LeDuff of The New York Times and his work on the paper's award-winning series on race.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg...
San Francisco Chronicle columnist Stephanie Salter says "careful, honest journalism is not an oxymoron."
Go To Page: 1
