Why I Won’t Be Buying Google at the IPO


© Kirk Lindstrom

I'd rather miss the chance to make a double to avoid the risk of a 90% loss. Those are the rough "risk/reward odds" as I see them today for buying Google (Announced Ticker GOOG) at the projected IPO price range of 108 to 135 dollars per share.

Google could double in a year, or it could be like any other internet advertising company and fall to a reasonable price to earnings ratio of say 15... which would be a factor of 10 drop! A table showing Google's total shares available for trading vs. time is an eye opener: Here is a quick summary:

As of IPO: 24.6M shares
As of IPO+6 months: 287.1M shares

I think only fools buy a 24M share stock offering when they know that 287M more shares, with a near zero cost basis to those who own those additional shares, will be on the market in less than a year.

According to Richard Peterson, chief market strategist for Thomson First Call, more than 5,000 companies went public between 1989 and 2000. Nearly one-third of those companies are down 50 percent or more since their stock market debut, Peterson said -- if they are even still in business! Only one-fifth are worth at least twice their opening day price. Few of these 5,000 companies had the hype that Google has had.

When I Would Be Interested in Google

I want to be buying stocks when insiders are buying, not when they are selling, even if to diversify and cash in on an IPO bonanza. Google could drop from an IPO of say $100 to $30 and insiders would still want to sell shares as their cost per share is next to nothing, if not nothing!

Google Competitive Advantage

I want to own companies that have a difficult, if not impossible, to duplicate competitive advantage. EBay's competitive advantage is their large number of buyers and sellers. Google's advantage is good search results that you don't have to wait long for. The speed can be duplicated by buying hundreds or thousands of off-the-shelf, cheap computers. The hardware is very easy to duplicate, as no patent is needed to network hundreds of computers to make a web site fast. The other competitive advantage is a good search algorithm, which many competing sites have.

Google is making money by combining speed with good search results where they can afford to add text based ads to their search results. They are even getting their pay per click ads shown on the web sites of others (like Suite101.com) where they share some of the ad revenue with the web sites who display the ads. The revenue growth this brings will only last so long before it saturates.

Go To Page: 1 2


The copyright of the article Why I Won’t Be Buying Google at the IPO in Investing/Personal Finance is owned by . Permission to republish Why I Won’t Be Buying Google at the IPO in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

60.   Mar 9, 2006 9:55 AM
.
We have a new discussion forum for Google on our new site here.

I also have an article called


-- posted by Kirk


59.   Mar 7, 2006 8:33 PM

posted here: http://finance.messages.yahoo.com/bbs?.mm=FN&action=m&board=1608859966&tid=goog&sid=1608859966&mid=659661

well done boildnoil

=================================

Last Instituti ...


-- posted by smile_1


58.   Feb 11, 2006 8:05 AM

BARRON'S COVER

By JACQUELINE DOHERTY

INVESTORS HAVE BEEN FIXATED on Google the past few weeks, as its shares have tumbled nearly 25% from a peak of $475 -- and the fact is, there could ...


-- posted by SteveT


57.   Feb 4, 2006 10:10 AM
Google poker
Commentary: Know when to walk away, know when to run


By Bambi Francisco, MarketWatch

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch)— Watching inv ...


-- posted by Normxxx


56.   Feb 3, 2006 4:24 PM
In response to Re: fatal flaw posted by smile_1:

Just so no one misses it...

The real story is that they put more into foreign o ...


-- posted by smile_1





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Kirk Lindstrom's Investing/Personal Finance topic, please visit the Discussions page.