|
|
|||
|
|
FED Model, Earnings Trends; Some Context for it© Normxxx As of October 10 the Forward 12-month (FTM) consensus estimate for Operating Earnings on the SPX is at $59.53. The all-time high was just shy of $63, back in '00. Trailing Operating Earnings through the September quarter (according to Standard & Poors, as of 10/16) are at $51.27. Trailing Reported Earnings are at $37.02. But that gap of $14.25 between Reported and Operating Earnings will close at the end of 4Q03 by at least $7 when 4Q02 falls off the look-back period. The current run rate for Reported Earnings is about $44.
In this context it's tough to predict a market crash. But keep an eye peeled for how the market responds when the acceleration in earnings tapers off, which it is bound to do sometime next year. In essence, Ed Yardeni's "Fed model" suggests that the Forward 12-month (FTM) Operating Earnings Yield on the SPX should be about the same as the dividend yield on the 10-yr Treasury. (The implicit assumption(?) is that Risk in stocks is offset by Growth in earnings.) So we can calculate Fair Value in this model by dividing the FTM consensus estimate by the 10-yr Note's yield. Right now the FTM EPS estimate is $59.53. The 10-yr Note's yield is 4.39%. So, 59.53/0.0439=1356. That's the Fed's Fair Value for the SPX, about 317 points higher than current levels. The Fed Model Risk Premium And what accounts for this 317 point disparity? Risk Premium. What would the Fair Value yield on the 10-yr Treasuries have to be at current S&P500 levels? In other words, what would the denominator on the left side of the equation (10-yr yield) have to be in order for the market's current level to be "fair" in the Fed's model. The simple algebra looks like this. 59.53/X=1039 (Current S&P500)
For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Normxxx's Investing/Personal Finance topic, please visit the Discussions page. |
||
|
|
|||