|
|
|
HTTP Security Holes The HTTP protocol has some more security holes to justify a firewall. One of them is that it allows remote users to request communication to a remote server machine, and to execute commands remotely. This security hole compromises the Web server and the client in many ways, including but not being limited to:
Most of these security holes are well known. Some applications like Netscape's SSL and NCSA's S-HTTP try to address the issue, but only partially. Web servers are very vulnerable to client's behavior over the Internet. Therefore, clients should prompt a user before allowing HTTP access to reserved ports other than the port reserved for it. Otherwise, these could cause the user to unadvertedly cause a transaction to occur in a different and danger protocol. You must be careful also with the GET and HEAD methods! The so trivial link to click an anchor to subscribe or reply to a service can trigger an applet to run without the user's knowledge, which enables the abuse by malicious users. Another security hole of HTTP has to do with server logs. Usually, a Web server logs a large amount of personal data about information requested by different users. Evidently, this information should remain confidential. HTTP allows the information to be retrieved without any access permission scheme. Many other HTTP limitations and security holes exist if we were to break down the ramifications of the above security issues presented by the protocol. Here are few HTTP configuration checklist to help you out:
Go To Page: 1 2
The copyright of the article Security Concerns in HTTP in Internet Security is owned by . Permission to republish Security Concerns in HTTP in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|