Disrespect towards poverty!

In today’s article it is useful to talk about social rights and their respect on International scene! Day by day millions live just on 1 US$ (1.3 billions) and little who cares for them. It is considered that affluent countries should look after their outsider brethren. Hmm, sounds good and righteous, but newer forget that by such actions you build up an International burocracy, that does not solve the problem just makes the rich more wealthy. This (and mainly all previous and forthcoming) articles do not have the aim to condemn a certain power, state or person (on national or international level) but the aim of awareness raising among those of you who do watch TV, listen to the radio communicate with other (certainly everyone who use Internet). So, there is an International community in the face of UNO, INGOs, Council of Europe etc. They are mainly composed or founded by governments or influential business circles (as there is no free ‘neutral’ capital).In this case the origin of money is not so important than the fact that leaders should be free of prejudice and willing to create a fund that has money for aid -not credits (IMF/WB, EBRD etc.)- without conditions. Money aimed for people, not for the government. Aid not in the form of used goods or just plain (daily) nourishment, but in cash, specialist and what is more important in liberal trade climate among the undersigned parties. When such talks appear in papers, politicians immediately reply that the nation does not support these actions (or that it may influence further election perspectives) and that tax-payers do not want to pay extra! Just a minute- when new taxes are introduced politicians act in the contrary- they try to persuade tax-payers, that if they pay everybody will feel better and that will reflect on the level of their children’s education, health and in general social care. That’s called dirty politics- when you mislead people (your electors). In real life we see that extra payments are made to boost the army, different diplomatic expenses and spy games. Who needs all these- it’s only a vision of national security (in fact the way to pull off money in affluent countries, as there is everything under the control of law and media, but the army and national security). In today’s world you can not live in a vacuum, that is to protect yourself from all outside attack or damage or surround yourself with a modern Great Wall- that is in terms of human rights the absence of will to recognize the right of the poor. In this sense the world changed a little, if any.

Go To Page: 1 2 3

Articles in this Topic    Discussions in this Topic