Lancaster is incredibly possessive of his sister, for whatever reason, and is willing to destroy her boyfriend's life. How he does this is rather clever. He gets Curtis to do the dirty work, but the results of that dirty work don't find their way into Lancaster's column. In fact, he gets Curtis to submit a blind tip (something with no names, but many tantalizing details) to a competing columnist. Of course, the idea is that Lancaster can't be implicated by his sister and boyfriend for planting this false story, and also can't be seen, publicly, as the sort of guy who would trash someone with such innuendo.
The dialogue in this film is something else, especially when you compare it to some of the stuff being written today. Most films today, while they might have clever or witty dialogue, will usually just have speech serviceable enough to move the scene along. Sweet Smell of Success, however, was, for me, the epitome of the verbal games that screenwriters often played, and, to be honest, was a bit of a challenge for me. Dimwitted me! I can't keep up with a 1950's picture, but there you go. The truth was that I was trying to figure out, and keep up with, the dialogue, which often hampered my enjoyment of the picture. The dialogue is way too clever; nobody in the world talks like this! Everyone speaks in cutting remarks, and clever witticism, which, if nothing else, shows that these characters must be geniuses, if they're able to think up such perfect statements at the same rate as we feeble folk muster up the undistinguished stuff we mutter to each other daily.
Go To Page: 1 2