Hitch-hiking: A Course in Personal Development?


© Bernd Wechner

Hitch-hiking: A course in personal development?

I was recently reading an interesting report on hitch-hiking in Germany by the Federal Bureau of Police there (Bundeskriminalamt or BKA in German). They make a very strong distinction between short- and long-distance hitch-hikers. Of the two they say:

    In the year 1984 the (East) Berlin police recorded 9 murdered hitch-hikers of which 7 were short distance hitchers and 2 were long distance hitchers.

My first impression was kind of like, "wow, that's a lot of dead hitchers!" And it is. Before your alarm bells start ringing wildly and you go out and burn all your hitcher's guide books, though, I should put it into context. The authors are prudent enough to observe that:

    Between April 1981 and February 1988 the Berlin Police registered 59 crimes among short distance hitch-hikers in Berlin. Of these 53 occurred after 7 pm.

The message there of course is that hitching home from the pub or disco of a night is what kills most hitchers by a long way. But I don't want here to talk about risks just yet; there will be time for that later. Instead, I'd like to turn back to the first quote, taking note that only two out of nine dead hitchers were long-distance hitchers.

Well, there are two ways you might explain a discrepancy like that. Firstly, there may be many more short-distance hitchers than long-distance hitchers, and I have to confess that's a strong possibility. The authors don't enter into any speculation on the matter though and it remains a mystery for now.

The other source of such a discrepancy might be that long-distance hitch-hikers are less likely to be killed than short distance hitch-hikers. That too is a strong possibility and let me explain why, leaning on yet another quote from the BKA. They write:

    . . . the risk of falling victim to a crime while hitch-hiking is strongly defined by the process of interaction between the driver and passenger.

What are they saying here? Well, I don't want to present pages of extracts here, and you'll have to accept my representation, I guess. Essentially, they argue that hitch-hiking crimes (with the exception of pre-planned crimes) don't just happen to you, they are much rather the product of a process of interaction between the driver(s) and passenger(s) and each of the players has a hand in the game and a chance to control the outcome. They are describing a social game here, not a physical game. It has to do with a relationship (driver-passenger) and the evolution and management of that relationship.

Go To Page: 1 2 3 4 5


The copyright of the article Hitch-hiking: A Course in Personal Development? in Hitchhiking is owned by . Permission to republish Hitch-hiking: A Course in Personal Development? in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

2.   Feb 26, 1998 1:11 AM
I have to agree Gerard, and it's always nice
to hear from you. I (and you) live in a world where heart-warming and trust-building experiences are all too often neglected in favour of the stress-bui ...

-- posted by The_Thumb


1.   Feb 25, 1998 10:44 AM
Hi Bernd,

Just a quick note, to not let the month go by without any reaction on your article. I must say that I was a bit surprised by the contents of your article. Not that I feel much different, ...


-- posted by GerardVL





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Bernd Wechner's Hitchhiking topic, please visit the Discussions page.