Home » History » Historical Re-Enactment » Authenticity Police and Snarking

Authenticity Police and Snarking

© Megan McConnell

This is a topic that comes up often no matter what sort of re-enactment you do. It is the most contentious issue, and the one that is the most acrophyal and emotive of all.

There are those who are unashamed AP’s, and those who live in fear of these people. There are those who believe that they have the right to tell people what they are doing wrong, and those who feel that this is just plain rude.

However, there is a middle ground, and the AP’s are sometimes necessary and a good thing. The main problem seems to be how they go about their instructing.

Firstly – what are the Authenticity Police – and what is a Snark?

Authenticity Police have many names – some call them Costume Nazi’s, some just call them Arrogant. I prefer the term Authenticity Police because it describes what they are doing perfectly – however sometimes it is not justified, nor do they have their facts correct.

Authenticity Police do, however have their place. If they are good they are there to ensure that the ambience of an event is not spoiled – they make sure that plastic bottles, cans and obvious mundanities are out of site.

At a Judged Event, or where the event has stated standards, they are necessary to ensure that those standards are met.

These people are special. They should (ideally) be diplomatic, knowledgeable and strong of mind. They should also be good listeners, and not afraid to get their hands dirty. They should also have knowledge of how they can help, or where somebody can get help.

That brings me to Snarks. So, what is a Snark? To me, a Snark is when somebody that you do not know comes up to you with the sole purpose of criticizing you – and not even constructive criticism. They criticize you and walk off – not caring or wanting to hear what you have to say, or to help you.

Personally – I have not been snarked before. However, I have seen and heard it, and have heard of many other instances of people being snarked. I have also heard from unashamed Snarkers who feel it is their right to do this.

Recently, on a number of lists I am on, there have been discussions on this, and on one list the question was raised that if you must be approached, how would you like to be approached.

A person I value a lot once gave me advice about offering critique – whether editorial, or any other. He said that one should use a ratio of 2 compliments to 1 criticism at all time. The criticisms should always be constructive, with an offer of assistance and reasons for the critique. You must be willing to listen to what the other person has to say – perhaps there is a reason.

The copyright of the article Authenticity Police and Snarking in Historical Re-Enactment is owned by . Permission to republish Authenticity Police and Snarking in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.