Suite101

Review: Jack of all Trades


© Josh Harrison

Take classic swashbuckling movies like Robin Hood, Captain Blood, and The Princess Bride. Throw in a dash of steam-tech, a la Brisco County Jr.. Mix with a liberal helping of James Bond sensibility. Pour over the exotic locales of New Zealand. Serve in half-hour portions.

This is the recipe for the Renaissance Pictures series Jack of all Trades. It premiered the same week as Cleopatra 2525, and, in most markets Jack airs concurrently with Xena: Warrior Princess.

Fan-favorite Bruce Campbell (Autolycus on both Hercules and Xena) plays Jack Stiles, an American secret agent assigned to the island of Palau Palau in 1801. He is partnered with the beautiful and intelligent English agent Emilia Rothschild, played by Angela Dotchin (best known for playing Nautica the Mermaid on Hercules). Together they work to thwart Emperor Napoleon's plans for world domination.

"Wait a minute," I hear you asking. "The historical accuracy of your description is all wrong. The United States was allied with France, not England. And, what possible part could Palau Palau play in this? It's a tiny island in the Pacific. I don't buy it."

My response to that comment? "Since when have you expected historical accuracy from Renaissance Pictures?"

Like the other shows from this company, Jack of all Trades is concerned with telling a good tale, rather than maintaining historical accuracy. If you get all wrapped up in the inconsistencies of the setting, you will almost certainly miss out on the sheer joy present in this production.

Take, for instance, the chemistry between the two leads. In my opinion, not since Bruce Willis and Cybil Shepherd in Moonlighting has there been such obvious energy between two actors. Lucy and Renee are great, but Bruce and Angela are more able to play with the sexual element in their character's relationship.

That chemistry is certainly helped by solid writing. Unlike its sister series, Jack seems to be very well suited to the half-hour format. Cleopatra 2525 lacks background development; there are too many missing pieces for the casual viewer to fill in. Jack doesn't suffer this problem, because this is very familiar territory. Anybody who's seen even one episode of Zorro can understand the situation.

And this, ultimately, is why I feel Jack of all Trades is the better series - at least at the moment. I think Cleo has greater potential in the long run, but it requires more serious involvement on the part of the viewer. This limits it in terms of mass-market appeal.

Go To Page: 1 2


The copyright of the article Review: Jack of all Trades in Hercules & Xena is owned by Josh Harrison. Permission to republish Review: Jack of all Trades in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

1.   Dec 14, 2000 2:40 PM
I agree with your review of Jack. I really enjoy Bruce's work. Found re-runs of Briscoe County and taped them...they are FUNNY!

I hope J of AT keeps going. THey can toss Cleo, but keep Jack! ...


-- posted by samfan





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Josh Harrison's Hercules & Xena topic, please visit the Discussions page.