|
|
|
In my last article we discussed the possible consequences for POPs on human health. As I said, it is difficult to get verifiable evidence with reguar to humans as it is unethical to do experiments on human subjects. However, as you may have seen, a number of agencies have voiced the opinion that there is enough evidence to put the precautionary principle into practice and look at way to avoid the production of POPs in the future.
The Challenge As already stated, POPs are a global problem effecting every area of the earth and every creature. Since these chemicals are toxic and build up in the fatty tissues of animals, it is vital to stop their production at source. Trying to manage these chemicals once they are produced will only continue to allow them to build up within nature. Enough evidence has been produced that POPs are polluting air, water and soil and that they create a distinct hazzard for wildlife. There is also a good amount of evidence to indicate that the wildlife health problems will be replicated in humans. Since large quantities of a lifetime's contamination can be passed on to young animals thought their mother's milk, the problem is only likely to get worse with future generations. This includes future generations of human beings as well as animals.Evidence has linked these chemicals with learning difficulties, immune deficiencies and reproductive abnormalities. What needs to be done?
Go To Page: 1 2
The copyright of the article STOPPING THE POPs: Part 3 in Green Home is owned by . Permission to republish STOPPING THE POPs: Part 3 in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|