After just two and a half months I am finally delivering the second part of this two part article, Readability Standards, IQ, and The Fourth Estate. A little explanation regarding this delay is basically that we experienced a devastating tornado in the Southern Maryland where my family and I reside.
This event totally disrupted and altered our life and developed into a necessary writing hiatus for me that I am now 'just recovering' from. I do want to thank you for your patience between these articles and if you are new to The Fourth Estate I welcome your attentive mind and thank you for joining us.
Moving forward and to pick up from Readability Standards, IQ, and The Fourth Estate I can attest that certainly I had a more conceptual ideology to share at the time this article series was initiated. Assuredly my current frame of thought may deviate from the origination in concept, however the results should remain similar. Together we will complete the journey of further research into IQ, semantics of intellectual capacity (if there are any), and general IQ testing site data.
Perfect, amiable, and sociable numbers are considered by science generalists, along with Science Fiction movie buffs, to be purist communication. Yet, only a quick glimpse at the aforementioned website draws from even the most astute reader this sigh and wonderment, "are we required as human creatures to know perfection in order to communicate effectively?" Don't we all yearn to comprehend the magic and science of a 'perfect number,' and/or 'perfection in message and comprehension' thereby understanding the most universal communicative forms? The mathematical technique of factor analysis invented by psychologists was designed specifically to answer the age-old question, "Is there more than one kind of intelligence?"
We now know that there are two types of intelligence tests: one is called "fluid g" which measures intellect utilizing culture "fair tests" such as the Raven Progressive Matrices or LAIT testing. Another called "crystallized g" which measures culture-loaded tests such as Concept Mastery Tests or Miller Analogies Tests (these latter two are the most commonly known IQ quotient tests). I can not offer the absolute answers to questions on IQ and intellect for anyone explicitly. These are concepts for independent minds to grapple with in their own measure. The ability to decide whether or not we are receptively developing self propelled intelligence quotients measurements is up to each of us. Is this all we need do?
This event totally disrupted and altered our life and developed into a necessary writing hiatus for me that I am now 'just recovering' from. I do want to thank you for your patience between these articles and if you are new to The Fourth Estate I welcome your attentive mind and thank you for joining us.
Moving forward and to pick up from Readability Standards, IQ, and The Fourth Estate I can attest that certainly I had a more conceptual ideology to share at the time this article series was initiated. Assuredly my current frame of thought may deviate from the origination in concept, however the results should remain similar. Together we will complete the journey of further research into IQ, semantics of intellectual capacity (if there are any), and general IQ testing site data.
Perfect, amiable, and sociable numbers are considered by science generalists, along with Science Fiction movie buffs, to be purist communication. Yet, only a quick glimpse at the aforementioned website draws from even the most astute reader this sigh and wonderment, "are we required as human creatures to know perfection in order to communicate effectively?" Don't we all yearn to comprehend the magic and science of a 'perfect number,' and/or 'perfection in message and comprehension' thereby understanding the most universal communicative forms? The mathematical technique of factor analysis invented by psychologists was designed specifically to answer the age-old question, "Is there more than one kind of intelligence?"
We now know that there are two types of intelligence tests: one is called "fluid g" which measures intellect utilizing culture "fair tests" such as the Raven Progressive Matrices or LAIT testing. Another called "crystallized g" which measures culture-loaded tests such as Concept Mastery Tests or Miller Analogies Tests (these latter two are the most commonly known IQ quotient tests). I can not offer the absolute answers to questions on IQ and intellect for anyone explicitly. These are concepts for independent minds to grapple with in their own measure. The ability to decide whether or not we are receptively developing self propelled intelligence quotients measurements is up to each of us. Is this all we need do?
The copyright of the article Readability Standards, IQ, and The Fourth Estate, Part Two in Fourth Estate is owned by . Permission to republish Readability Standards, IQ, and The Fourth Estate, Part Two in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
