I would argue, however, that you do not need a 'forensics' program to receive the training you need in this area to work in forensic populations. The truth is 'forensic' related psychology graduate programs are relatively new. The psychologists working in this field do not have training from such schools. And they seem to be doing fine. In fact, the president of one of America's forensic psychology organizations actually recommends against the more 'limited' focus forensics programs.
Graduate school is very different then undergraduate work. The departments tend to be 'very' flexible with a students interests. Along with the clinical requirements one needs for the degree there is much area to expand ones academia into realms that pique their interests. In my case for example I am currently taking three classes. Clinical Interviewing (how to do a interview, intake [assessment], and diagnosis), Psychotherapy (therapeutic methodology), and Clinical Assessment (test administration and interpretation). These courses alone are all aspects of ones knowledge foundation that is required in both clinical and forensics work. Dealing or testing a forensic population is really not that different then a normal one. There is standardized procedures to follow, and methodological considerations that transcend both types of clients.
Go To Page: 1 2