|
|
|
|
In today's court system one of the strongest pieces of evidence, or that most commonly accepted as fact by a jury, is eyewitness testimony. When correct, eyewitness accounts can aid in the conviction of many guilty parties.
However, when incorrect, eyewitness testimony can do extremely severe damage. There is numerous cases of false identification in the psychological literature, perhaps no case is more strikingly relevant and ironic then that involving psychologist Donald Thomson.
This begs the question of what we can do about eyewitness memory. It does indeed appear to be unreliable. Should it be excluded all together without co-oberating evidence? No, probably not. There is however techniques that can be used by the police in order to optimize eyewitness memory. One such technique is the "cognitive interview." The cognitive interview is a questioning technique designed to optimize accurate retrieval of experienced information. There is four components or 'retrieval mnemonics' in the cognitive interview: (1) The questioner should attempt to mentally recreate the environmental and contacts thats occurred at the time in which the crime was experienced. (2) The officer should attempt to encourage the reporting of every single detail. Even if it seems to be completely irrelevant. If it occurred during or surrounding the incident it should be reported. These two components are based on the principle that with increased overlap and consistency between the events of the crime and the recreated situation there is an increased likeliness that recall will be more significant. Go To Page: 1 2
The copyright of the article EYEWITNESS MEMORY: ITS PROBLEMS & SOLUTIONS in Forensic Psychology is owned by . Permission to republish EYEWITNESS MEMORY: ITS PROBLEMS & SOLUTIONS in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|